CTA Case No. 5052 (Resolution)
t.' n ') t:o 1 l id 11 ~ l 0 h f ui s fQ ll l ] I ~ 'flC\1? p 1. fl t.h t. w t th ,... ~t 1 . n l p 48
l 1t - � Ay M � ch 'I !1.Q!. lC' t 1 n "' fle 1 ' r fo1... ttl h th 1 fo�~ 1 1 nr 1 r l ~r d [I 'I 7 - lTA .. led to T ."l the G F l. - 'II; t 0 antl t l ondt w \"' nne1 tht� 11 1 n h ., ll p vnt d nd . ' 49
s .~ o. 052: paid to R pond nt h e �o\.mt f P 4 Lf , l TI ett le f!' t of t h 19Bl d fic1 ncy docu� nt )~y 6 mp 6 mn ; P3l,e a.1o lTI n 0 h 19 1 d ficiency lTlCO H nt Tt 1 lJ ged l b of th 1f 1981 t1H d d Wl hh ld n . �. &.5 en nh lit y 1& Id R $p n h 0 d .... ll ettle n f c: d lC n y nco p rc nt 9 c)( nd xp nded wit old n n' . nd rei>p ct y l nn )( ) Notw nd h f e ld ll d C'O pro� 1 f# py n& oc pl.,O h Cl~l 1 n c s �. Ti .p J nd am on A. Alb Nos. t COl nd 9 se o. 91 7 h CJ"'i llll 1 a l1 d wr dl fill s fi n h dy ' micably d h )"' b o t��e a,.. nc.:l I i, h, n 0 now, 16 ttll ,d n 1 ton lt l p hi J( f ~ ,.. 0 r hl th ud on 0 lJl a W< 1l ec: lY d by fespond nt compr'OIIIl s 1de by. s tt l ... nt bet wh1ch sh ftl d to hQnot.. Tid ...... 50
RESOL JTI C.T.. c No .. It Th Re pond nt, how v )ft d n1 d th t co111promise ...ttl lll�>n nd th p t1tlon r .alleg1ng ' n fi l~ he 11 eged tu11 w s r en d b tw . t th ong 0 h �~s, hc;t pay� nt de on Apr� l 13 ' 9 :::> th cr1JD:ln l ct on& agiuns v. Hor C'lO Pobl do� nd fl IliOn A. Alb 'r"t & off'i er 0 tl lOTI ) 0 1l1tuJ nd n w l 1 Ul~E' to p y h l l 2 d flC n y mn lt dy p nd n n co ...n"'t t of or n uppl1 d� CTA e OJd ,:.;. 41). ...Dus h then , lfiOV t th 9l.,OUO that .. h . 1 no h I nd1ng b en re1n pet it on nd pond m C' as c.~ . ml :n 1 5�> 14 of f the NlRC 0 1f f '1 l of ' Maka B n h 14 ' litl g . 1on Jn d tl 10n �houl b d l d 0 ' l n 1 e l l 1 of t .New Rul c Ul " P� We ., olve th 1101: 0 n y I of h f po n P tlt'lon 1 1 p t l 1 n fo lly d�l ted, ' C' cl d II s n, S!io\.1 d h dn' ef<H"' s 10 cr1 ., ) 15 u nd (He to r solv d ln t fOl"'l' d cl~l llll n ca s, p ll 6\.1 nt 0 th �.. 51
RESOLU I C. T.. ~ � Ca e No .. 5 .. Revent Cod <P tition for Rev1ew. . p. .. ) nd hast n d to dd, how ve th t "th i n~H t nc: of r r.ponden COIIIIIU 5 i OJHJl~ l T olding on t the C:O p OIU payf!J n , whi 1 e h �" Pt~osecut 1 on Divi s1on refuses to hono~ r.uch co p)~omls., s wholly i 11 gal .., nd bl ... l � (Jbld. W und nd th ~ d1c � n of th P 1 on r yet We c nno lh , wh ch i s ln ~ r1c bly n. rtw1n d w h th pre nt foJ refund, h )l~ dy b c "' 10 1 nd IOC:On S b}e and th ~~ for no lon r w1tt11n Out~ h gu Court cqu1 � d th J 1 d1ct 1 on ahe d of U nd r.hotld 'e ln th f1na res ol\.lti n. Jn f ct, P on l n v l bef ore th s Co 1 t f l y b 1 lfl th t 1 h r g\.11 r Ot.ll"t W 1 h 1d q�u r d IC'h Jll dJC -on. And right 1y o. H nee c nno ,~.... J on h ce l ~l te 1 lly d p nd nt on h s Ill c se. Si Npl y put W c nnot s um J n~1 sd 1ct 1 on ov � the l' fund case r.1nc W w "e not ble to ssu th a � n c se. On .. nno th r fo� , be separat d h othe Wl ho�. VitO) lOg h doc � .10 of "11u lt1pl :t y 0 Ul t" ". Th ' l' 1 s l y, w th pronounc m n of the Supreme of tho Co m:t~Dione~ of lot rn l ~ venu 52
Rerot.:U C.. l . . . o. of App � 1 , Ci y ~u nkJn Corpo tion -nd Cow~ o x App 1&~ G.R. JO 611 July 21 1994 wh ch rl..tl d, hu : 01 \1 LV, th 0 VOld uJttp) 1ty of Re pond n 1s h r by 53
RES ur C. T. A. Ca e No.. 5Q52 7 suits pur su~nt to S~ction 1 (e) Rule lG of the R le& o CtH.trt. I 54
More in CTA Resolutions
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ABUBAKAR YSMAEL AZIZ (Proprietor of YSMABAZ IMPORTER AND GEN. MDSE. 252 Zuzuaregui St., Old Balara, Quezon City) [consol with O-759](CTA Case No. O-758)
- MANUEL B. PALAGANAS DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE STEMIKO COMMERCIAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8394)
- VENTIS MARITIME CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8737)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. OMYA CHEMICAL MERCHANTS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1593)
- CTA Case No. 1596 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1596)
- MELCO RESORTS LEISURE (PHP) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE [consol with 10052](CTA Case No. 10029)
- RIOFIL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1984)
- TAGANITO HPAL NICKEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9128)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.