[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 35424
[ G. R. No. 35424. March 07, 1934 ]
LUCIO VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. CIPRIANO DE TORRES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Batangas_________, dated the _________29th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from__________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 165407. June 05, 2009 ](606 Phil. 464)
- [ A.M. No. 439-MJ. September 30, 1976 ](165 Phil. 110; 73 OG 3157 (April, 1977))
- [ G.R. No. 107036. February 09, 1993 ](291-A Phil. 847; 90 OG No. 2, 187 (January 10, 1994))
- [ G.R. No. 227215. January 10, 2018 ](823 Phil. 477)
- G.R. Nos. 207340 and 207349, September 16, 2020
- [ G.R. No. L-6327. July 29, 1954 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-15988. August 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. NO. 160843. July 11, 2006 ](527 Phil. 143)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.