CTA Case No. 74 (Decision)
� UIMIS � � T. � J. IO A, ri:~ ollectox of Intunal evenue , \ espondent. ~'~t\ x- - - - - � - � � - - � -a 1I his � an appeal fr the ecls1on of reapon� t Collector of Int~al ev ue dated January 27, 195!> ( nnex �o� , p. 77. rec..) ass asing the uaount of 37 . ~. as alleged de k1~y sales tax, surchar e d ~o~rOaise p alty, due fro the unre lstered part- nershlp ~011posed f petitioner d nando f. de Villa- llle doing slness W\dR e naae of the !latter alone. be parties su 1tted the case foz ecls!on on the sis of a stlpulat1 of acts tlfacta� for s ort) lc incorporated by way of aMexes certain portions f record. f the eau of Internal eveoue. These acts are he.r..lth s A a public b!c:kU.ag conducted y the urplua o- puty !salon � ernando Ula- rille ��� the suc~essful bidder for the purchase of all va le goocla located a"t - 3 uar aval ae, iuan, .-ar, fo� the of 94 , ~. 00 excluding t e foll in a �20 tons of n heeta . ' 580
� 74 .. 2. 11 oad llers ~Trucks , argo an t en t� au of ort� lcati 0 r eelpta. � (Annex � � , � ud �� ly pprovecl y t � ve......llaant nte.rprtse ( ex ). t��� ontrol C i n in -Invoice o. 1770, dat � cceasful dd nder anager ' s eck o. 13040 (Ph111pp ne 1nk. of C eree} to cover :the re tre<l deposit of ~ of t r- c as r ce, for ece t o. 7 ted r 1 22, l ( nnex " � , P� � tl acta), 1s sauec:l. inca � 11 dld no ave t e necessary fun � to cover pa,.ent of t � purchase ~lee, the ~ c ensat ng t x, �� well as t e ie r an ta- r! le for reco dttion g the goods for use or sale, e lnv!t p tit oner to prov de the ece���ry capital re- � � ired. cce te and on ay 28, ~~ . pe- ffer tloner � Vlll - !lle extcu 4td an agre nt ( nnex � ltlonJ ex �t� rJ par. 10, ti- eta) � dying t � te 1 and co lt ns t e f the � pertinent port ons � quote hereu er' 58 1
E � 74 - 3- ) y 52
cLn.;"r""�J.O�)I E o. 1 -- to re� co- t 11zin N12. t 11 �� ny und t h t ' s; 6 ,, 53
~L - .T.A. C O. 74 Upon h at t for oing nt , � F rn ndo 1111- rille a d to the ur lus ssto h ln!ng bal 0 th ch of the good th cl 1 of th co.p O$ t t x of � th r g vid c d by ff c1 1 cp � 194 ( nn x ' par. � f th ecor - Ii r c. � n ly nn x p. par. o, ti ct ) s n th n of t ic: d r to ~ov r t � & 1 0� .V111 - rille ol portion o t � oo to - ato o. , n 1 9, n th r ll � �u y 28 , 1952 ( r. 3, n e ti ion , .._. 2 , pu o p r .. ap r6i u� 1 ~ 111pp.bl y ll - ~ill� ci ru cc.;ount th 0 in lhe n f ern&nd � Aorille uu/or Jose oju n d/ r e t.rl o- juan c � y ir � of �h ic ncy t x nt .� 58 1
�4 - 6- a�ter 0 nti ned. t ount of 7 . !)31.. ��t on J n 7, 195 fro d cc ount of the f t rn 1 ev n ct t f 1 c ion n h! ..) n. p. 7 � 79 1, ro p -Invo1c X ) y ~ ... � I. 1, ltt d en 1 r port ( � � a, s), h t .) ry 27, ~ ( � � 77 � t �� �) . t 7, 1. 11 1� ���� ������� 1 . 77 � 2 --------------------- :AL � � � � � � � � � � � 3. v ' 585
ECISI~ � ,T.A. E N � 74 - 7- 'l 0 ~-~~--~~---~--~-~~------- r tal tax Tax till Due -~-------~~-~-~~-----~~---- 29 . 7 5. 1 n of 1 t1on ~~-~~-~----- T :AL � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � t � �� of tn r f ct th ss s follo 1n t 11 c 1 ly t t (1 ( 2) t flr t u � oner cont n t t r1g1n 1 1 11 subj ct to t n r ctlon 1 X Co i t tr n r h for 1 0 y 1 � at ov .rn to rpl Pr p rty &1 � et1t n r r u s th t h 1 t r i corpc ency joct to t un r h .r vi 1 publlc ct o. � ich provi t t . I 11 C r r - 1��� tiona, a em: or in tru nt 1 t! o.r con� troll� the t 11 p y s c �� tax � f���� � ther c r es up n ct on. si- �� n �� � !ncius ry. sal� r inco ll:'e 0 y1 586 sg~
cD . � 74 - 8- upon !vidual& , a soc tiona, or corporati ns n a � 1n any ta ble 51nes � in u try, act v t , exc pt on goo a dit � ort d or rch sed n old or diatr t y ined by t Prest t f th !lipp� � � vn 1f th tran er fro n d t te& ~ rn n to the urplu a ratuitou � th la neve su ct 0 t 1� r r tax cl sho ld treat t or! inl 1 � nt- 1ng th t t cqui 1t1 fro h nit t vernmant not h l: 1n 1 1 p t1t1 r rt r the co ten tb t 1 t h t 0& r r "" rplu& 1 op rty 0 1 sion to F rn n o 'ill - 1 t or 1 sale or t t 1 t tio houl tr t tz-ans ctlon t n t. att n ll. o. � fin t first co,ent1o 11 - nt le. n th ir&t l c � te rplu& 0 110 s not t xa 1 in titutl � h:l& ere t d by x cutiv �2� r � ur uant to th provi tons of c i n 2 pu c c o. , and a by � x cut1 o. 1, te un � 20, 1 47, euat 'i n or in trator of th surplus 00 a ~c � ~d y th lie of hilippin from the United S at~e f r c � e a erely n agency f e over t for t e e eepln ~d/or disposal of pr rtles tranaferr Th r - � fore en the surplus go re sold or !a e 0 � it 57 sB
I� C.T.A. C a tO. 74 - 9- waa th Ph111pp1ne Gover ent th t � � 1n f et th van or th r f . 'ons1d r 9 that it oul flou� for t � govern..nt to tax it&tlf, lt beco a apparent th t said s le o th rplu& ds is not the "or!g nal aal Q taxa~l� 1thtn purvie of � - t1 n "' lB6 oft Tax c de J o equently, following t4t juris ru ence �- r, 41 o�. pp. o. x ort o. v. er, � � o. L�2927� ruuy 2 � 19 lJ avigation Co. v. tar, � � o. of t said aurplua in the pa~nt o t e corraspon 1n sales t x provided in ection l of tht tax e, i Farnan o � de Villa- brill�, t first pu ha r he eo � t ee �&5 � ourt held that t UDpo:- tion asa not �0 plated tth the elivery y the �e!gn Li !dation Co. is ion of the rplus go plaintiff ( h ng Tee). the impo.rta le d o ly after the corre n- ing dUties or a ea upon s id oods has en paid. this v1 as a e o th t eory that !le the �r oda were un er � control f the A can forces for military purpoats, 'he 9 00 s hould not p y ny tax s o th� Govern nt f Philippines. Ace rd!ngly, the taxes acczutd n tht surplus goo a he~� n qu t on, nly upon tht transfer of the o Go Ch n 1' a for c rctal purposes. ol low!ng thta doctrine f ernando P. d Vill - 588
ai- l! � 74 - 10 - A ~ille is the porte= of t ~urp s 9 o herein as c te lat d oy oction 186 of th T x Co � It follo o o:ol at on pay th ~ l s t x ars s in h ca F rnando V l lle y t .urplu � ll no oc d o h n x to et u o t ti 1 1 for f cie y n nd nt , nd f � what s t� 11 ill "'� h r aolut u st � 0t volv - on t (1} h t t n t r of th r 1 ti n 0 t 0 tit �on for vl n p t!t! n r n � �n d (2) f th1 r l ti n tn rr. ip r ci t on , h t a r of th oner' r n. n 1n th t r ln tion, it 1 n 1nd th t t 1 n re !or 0 �9 ppl 0 c hr 0 t h f ct h t t c apir lor �c � f t rov s o nd � of th - fo ot ti 1 gr nt nt r nto y and n F rn n o Vill - n pt �t ( �� p ttt1 n or v t � es nt e f (jo1nt ccount) d y r 1cJ. ive of the C de of C c:e. t cl� 2 t r o �� pz-ov! �� �� foll 1t80 �I 5 '9
� T. � " � 74 -11 .. r ot nt ~o ta...p atas cantil tr c io of F rn ndo t � ucc saful i r of urplu p i- t1 t:r eca e in rest d n nd y v � t f ich la t contri f 7l. 67. hich con 1- utet 65} of t. c pi l r quir d y th fo r to finane is purch se of he ood in esti n. h � t f the c pit 1 ( ~ th reef) or � 82.50 t d by f rn n o 0 ty nc pre o ds to ho � ch al 0 r ,. t. h nt 11 r th C<.' f.J J.l\ l proport!o � 0 - sily �r p to f r- nt. 9 tr n ! � d lnt n ~ 0 u r hi n i idu 1 r pons� 1 1 1 . od of rce). hO$ c ntractin it � V!ll - ill h v a :1 ht of ction nly. d not 1nst p - 1t1on r � o mi cr ly .tnt r d in th tr act! n nd 11 p tit 'ton r .ould v o ri l t of ction a inst t tb~d perso contr<lct 590
c.r�. E � 74 - 12 - 111 - 11 nlesa th latt r for lly ced d his rights to th � ( rticle 2 2, ode of Co Z'C . ) It y h v r e e that the an � by reapon � t ga1nst p i 1 n r pr nt x lia i- lit! for t 1 P9� 1 r le of oo nd o not arise fro t fr a statute. r, o lig tlo s er!v d fro la e not epr &U ly those ex r sa.ly th or 1 la s e of fore n hl ea vt nc eho a hat the goods e.re reb y ill lo his� n� also ol of 1n t a only erch 17 -179 , X ). 11 naactl ~ ff � id hn � ntlty, f.nt r t., n C!p on titio iacl � ln o r or t titi r nly � cr t partner lle ern lll th p rent r ostens1 le � tn � cu nt tie1p lo �� n � tl � -to p y t al u rn n - 11 11 d apose f $t i ern i l la not titioner 1 � 1r � 1n sales tax, �it u lc t o h for er have again t h 1 t r y virtu 0 a �� nts. 1 1 111 y exists, the asses ant t r of a ul n 1r ct 591
� 74 -- a a . at ernando de Villa r lle the o tensible er- e ant f.n . oae n the tra � ti s have ma e . Th ct a t nt. a st et1t1on r re l ul. l ho t �Y pe ~p ru t a re - nt 1~ t provi overn nt 60 f � l ful r venues y c r. in n of ( c� 1n t 1 r co t � t) , rt r 1 0 :vi it us t o fr as r esort 0 s to e a f ing cor in ly. $1U t p rtner 1 a � t oul n !ly folio ille 1 rr tl ntly ~h tr t 1nl ale� !t � It ul t le y uc partn r- � � ul nt r ct n X Co � nt , (c t p ti- t 1 r ns ct1 Af ct on- si ered ala p rtn r hip, 11 � � na;in p tn � or th p the 11 , h uld fir t su � fro f � t i ion r is not th proper p rty to a as � n l 1111 1 592
II - � 74 � � A. C - 14 - for t xe 1n es ion~.\ It o vio ly foll that tit1 � er c nnot el lta lc fo t � c ro is& penalty. t any r t~ . 1n view of th esse e of a co !%'0 d it n n t b vin r a th r t , he ea � lia ny o~~ 1 pen lty. lD e1s1on ollector of nternal ..ran- uary 27 , 1 ~5 . h in p ti � ner ia le r I d fi� eiency sale a hu it i I r y e sed, ith ut pron nt 0 � � � tla, hllippin o r , l 57. ociat Ju u L:I dtd no 593
More in CTA Decisions
- AB LEASING AND FINANCE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5513)
- CTA Case No. 251 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 251)
- HEDCOR, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8964)
- AECOM PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8971)
- CTA Case No. 5352 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5352)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1087)
- RIECKERMANN PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9613)
- LAPANDAY FOODS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2032)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.