CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 12091209 1964-07-15
CTA Case No. 1209 (Decision)
: - --;:- 1 c 1 , t � � I� 165
- �1 � . " II 166
� - � 1 1 1 � v � cs 1 � nv a � 11 t � c 10 r r 1 �� 1 - r ( ) 167
�1 .- � � 0 ' � 10 0 t � I' 16 8
- 01 t 0 0. 0 l n 0 1 1 ( lie � .) r t 1 c 1 'I 7 � - 1 0 0 169
� 15 1 1 � r - � 7 question was made fn accordance wftn Department Order No. 289-A (Nov. 19, 19~7iJwhich provides in part: 170
. t c � n j o" I' 1 7 1
- t � 1� y �t I � 1 t � ... � t n � ( � 3 '7 () t - 1 1' 1 �� � 0 t 1 �1 11 ' 1 1""1 ' ) . ' ,<.
t .. ..i � ;ll 1 1"I"'1 ~ ')
More in CTA Decisions
- TAGUM AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8917)
- ASC INVESTORS, INC. v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his capacity as the City Treasurer of Davao City(CTA Case No. EB 1568)
- CTA Case No. 6706 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6706)
- CTA Case No. 1169 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1169)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (PHILIPPINES), LIMITED(CTA Case No. EB 2878)
- ZENOREX MARKETING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10729)
- CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8245)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GRAND UNION SUPERMARKET, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2893)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.