[ G. R. No. 39169. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39169. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39169
[ G. R. No. 39169. June 06, 1934 ]
GAUDENCIO DIVINO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. VALENTINE NATIVIDAD, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Nueva Ecija__________, dated the__________25th______________ day of __________November _________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the plaintiff-appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the defendants-appellee_________ from the __________the plaintiff-appellant _________ the sum of P_ 40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 135047, March 16, 2001
- [ G.R. No. L-36626. April 15, 1988 ](243 Phil. 251)
- G.R. No. 151402, August 22, 2008
- G.R. NO. 169517, March 14, 2006
- G.R. No. 209195, September 17, 2014
- [ G. R. No. 40490. September 05, 1934 ]
- [ G.R. No. 44038. May 18, 1938 ](G.R. No. 44038)
- [ G. R. No. 39801. March 14, 1934 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.