CTA Case No. 1986 (Decision)
RP "Rt.TC OF THF PHTLTPP, :�.n�:S C <' t � h T 0 F T.\ X .-\ l' PEA LS QCE~O~ Cll'Y c c_o . .' .. . ~c l I ........... l6, 95 o, �aspoud. nt . . . r:t� .. er.. :t tn . r. - v- � 1e ,a�t3.oo p . t1 l ~~- ... d r 3 6"' 0" � ,' 0t) nA'wl. l��r ) � l ' � in . U~,.j, f.l. l.. .~, .-!:' ,.J.~,Q.t,").�,�.~.�"".".."�.-~. ~-l.-~.f..,�.,<.�t � . 342
- � 19 .t a 'ic:l J ':J u t . h -...~~ 1'1 0 15, .ig 1 tt i () l:J.. 1.' t. ir . e i io �nc� 1) t X ln re 11, E b , ""'1 Ul.t� .:1 � tor Vie~ot � La� q'U ty, r 1! :1..1 a lo ~);�� �lilt , u 3 1'~l 1 67 1!1~ 1d � Dt " tr ~c t .. ~ .jl,IJ � �0.0' id . l 14, i e ti t.ione.. �!I blt
-- .ro p itl*">n r ' s r qn�t:..t� c .noelln .lthdr. 1 1' , ...(!:,.. lt!l~ t� t.ioA Ott 1 t ... a 4. .. :roy 0 " ty 1 r1 " ~.~o.... 1'l e l r {\(.)J'i.$:0trP.i - utln �-� a~., ��nt~J l"t"!t- IX. !:";. 1-'itliv J! :f h at:1 fl" t ..,..... i �n, !.t t al t.Cl' .. � R ~tt:U ' ..:ode a r~; e. '>0 t �~.......r;.;u \lh l1ab11it.t s '10 or d 11l u t �� et!on on t un :..o, lJ. on ti J...he ott;., , r en� t;J.":l.Oil$ n !" e J.t \J y ... 1~ .� Q,;J._, s � .i t t � t.1o r l'il '~d :4 t~ ~- 1 3U. �� �ll � 1 6 ep;> 0..1. w{ ~1 t. c u.rt. 344
4 d~c tv 1t.t (l) ~�lht' t er or , c~; ot:t tirJ -.':.U� t $ fi.)l1Crtl. to tttia Co\ is �iu1u-~� t�r"� ' . � � J ndent ' s $dV!I'!t � � ne~i~! ..a eo:1f'<lrtnrJblZ"' �:r ~h {1 ) t fL.ction ?�� \opt.' li~~ d .: j. � 1 Z;,~ . "�lo �r..id !1.W n Th~tt 3$� d~y p�>l>:�iod i'Qr a )U!ll to tho 'rt\X c.;urt must b eo .Q' t~tl !'T ...m ch :- iraa t;l.-<":1 t:r�.. �y r :t'ee :31v�e t ..... . 1 ... n th t~ s� 3 ont. ( " .- e,~1 1 M ~c~ � v, Col � o.f '&'"., Int. 10't hU. 31q�; "� _1".~.<,0 d.o Cot1.n c .�t~ 'lub .v. J � ol. � bu v. ol � o o r ot Int. r 31 , 1964 , � lla 1 l - 2 9 !, J nu 3 �1 5
i~ov.- 2~, 1966t tO l>C� .A 7!)1) . In t~h'!l l1i!;ht or th~ settled doctr1tte :e.bov �fi'rt.nted, it lllla)?' n~)"W bCll ~ �o1.h �'bien d ih lcf' of tho rtls~uln ��14nt ts a;:~l~o.lnbl& tQ W . ~tltloM ., s...id t G~J> :u.d~nt t ~~ find ~tik'l1~ tb..e d td,al anti z. d 'and� ,tol:' �. �:~uiitd by 11eglt.~nal Oir a'tor V. ::o. wque 1 on Marc!l 1~6B (Ei~h~ Uti) eon~ 1tute ttl.$ :rwl Q: t :rrtdr;mt1rJl or daci�:1oo ot'1 :~~a1;1t1ctx~~'s 19!iS d t9~;t d~f:tc:: .1l.l.nr~Y inconn tax llaJ;iJ.J�. t:Loo . .~aid letter ot h:~cb ~20, 1969 repr sont�B t-~~:;,_.)OH.d �!lt. �t~ d .et- r. oor..Fsi t :x-~.t on ovnt--d.�u~d :tn tbv ltrtt~-x- at~ petit onor �s ~<:cou...rtt~ ~t , te.i:r$ , Catl.l)� J .. Vti oe~1 ~. o, , dat~ ;t~t 1tionGrt $ �~~~~re$t. for "':!1!v~r.aw: 1 ;� r~:i e;.li"l .al.lt'lt!on of tb.t!} rlis~t~t:~d ~Gee. l.:�l1ii($llts teo uze �~ � th .f'$.Ct.. ...,l,rhdy 346
�:cnno .. C'll CALL v.� 198 y ~ t t1o.G s Cl( ' l ~ p 0 t t st l 1� Qtl. by ~ta c1 t~t a �ld tl ~ h le;lwt � 0 by u ;J ri..-.p d . c � it~V � t ( 1) ...::: �ti t t. ., Sue,. i lo u .~,� ;,.... , .. t.a � t: "1 ' � nd � . :f' or , ~hut J ..; . 1 347 f � r~h 20, 1 ti. 34 -::r
.. 1986 J..r for 1 ;6' � 28, t'S~ 19$..-IOO"U d� �t~t! ~"'a"' t "'mbor co . -..ru~bar v. Coll" 0 In � ' ...a. 1~� "~� l J v. c ll. f 1n o � ~ .. 30� l' ! nt � (}~r LJ?;iod ot� OlS !UG.Ht .v, tho u .-n�e 1 C!Crt!ll e d pp.r 1, :r ';f t lfJ ' li.L f ti ion r � t\tion.. S-~ ou.1;1 .o ~o delay in ~ t �l$ment tax b u lfl t 1;1 d . l.l. v
., . !tC� ..or � ' t3 ti � R�p. ct o� ( � ,.,. 95J � t . ., 1 � 7'5 � tt 1o r its al � ith n �tCt!' . d 'Y L 2f73t, Pt �1 ~ � �� O.n\1 tor : a 1968 ... 111 t't O..da)r A 2Q v.un . 20, 19 � � i, nt ~"~""'"' h sp c eon... id .... 1" (. s p l 1t � ,'0 � 1 ' 1 ? CttA .. � 11 )t~� n Jo,' ' oo �� Ine., ). 349
19 ic t � ' 3� � 1 � 19' � I 350
More in CTA Decisions
- SAS INSTITUTE (PHILIPPINES.), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10537)
- EMERSON ELECTRIC (ASIA) LIMITED - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8532)
- KEPCO ILIJAN CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 528)
- CITY TREASURER OF MANILA v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION, and the Hon. PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 173, MANILA(CTA Case No. AC-66)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-52 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-52)
- CTA Case No. 4297 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4297)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE V. LBC EXPRESS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1365)
- CTA Case No. 2613 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2613)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.