CTA Case No. 211 (Resolution)
f { j( r-; I ( {'' I ftEPUBLT C OF THE PHILIPPlNES CUUhf v F TAX APPEALS' MANILA : , - ... � ... ... . .. - /1 tt � - � t - .. ., 3 0-7
... 2' n , - "" .. OJ:' � t _.,o- 4 0 2 0 er. l , e .u ., � ' -~---�
� , ... � �
r .... � , .. .. 1 � t in ,.... n � ./, I .. 30 8
- ... r qr�i:r. mer ly . h t ' t ..l � ti l � � f 1t. ;ut n as ! � 1 1 t fo 'r ... �----=-� 309
� y .. y r te 7 ... $. � .. � � � � l � .: a. ~~ 31 0 JL
LUTl ~ I 0 . 2ll , I n other o.rds � :r �P a s by i � li.catio may b r sort . t o by the Cou t only s 1 ~ t r ec u:rs wh un r o r asonabl e hyp ot e si cantle p ision s o'f bot b con t e as co xisting. {pp . 549 . . � 551 , Vol. ' r i c n Juris rud nee. ) n th t In th nt c , t h c p r ! ;;~ions or ap a ent than I al . T C01 ld b r c neil d , nic i t l. S tL f � nc t ion of < to- tu con t uc tion t f �ec ua-: ' if DO" . ibl_ , 1.0 f und of nat i o a l .i.nt � rnal - ::ev n t es . n ord x to c onf.er juri sd.i.c t ion pon t '-li our t , t ual clai m fo . r f ~~d r cr ed't s c ondit J. O pr cedent , shou be fi led wit t h ol c t or of I .. ter lR v en� e �i t .dn o (2) y "t'S fromthe d t o p y nt , {section 3C6)lat on 1 I ntern l v n C de � P. J . ' ener Co., Ltd. vs . atu:rnino avid , / sirrple prot st at � he tim of pay en o pr vio b j tion t tax .JlO t..a � t p ac o r q ir � cl i or :r JO V � 1 ct r f Int l filing of t p eti tion fo r r v iew before tnis Court by th t ax - ay r fo the xec e of taxes aid s ould be it i nt i ty ( }'days f ro ' rec ipt o t r ruling , o er r ec1sion of t e Col lector of ~nt ern 1 v u d nying ~ clai f or r efund (sect i on 11 , . ubl i ct a 311 '
.. ,. "' - , � �l n.., � ....... ) � � � c� ...: , ....... ~ r � ""- ! .. u 1 t � ba , � � y � � on � - \ 312
� id �- ul � , h iI � n� t � ... ) n� � 3 .1.L0J
� ' . '~ - t �u !y l v � u. - � � 1427). iti1 , d reel. ( � 221 � 2 ' � 65. 1 - f wa). 2. t� 1 nt 19� 5. _ht Collec :tor r un n 1 � �nty 7) 'i~ l QU tt fo th f at t t . ry in � ct on f he f ur r e �t .1 � t . ~as r � .apply s tior, 1 of ic .,,th t rty (30) d y~ c fr c t � 1 7, hich () �h t tr n e 0 is C t. i tin n is:
-- - !' 315
c. OLUf . 1 ... - , 2- I t her or � in f irn $" to t t xpayer 0 n p of his d y i court hp t � judi ti~.> 0 his cac h is 1 ft by "ty to pr \W. an c nclud re th xpi.r ti n o th t o- y iptiw :.r.:.od, th t c for r f n t i d y th ~o...l c tor of Intern l v nu n io 'I by t l r ng ta rio � ' t i ci - fi r ra y not 0 l t X� p J c �� r $ no re Yr c - 1: �a ; .d � cis� on of 0 i titlo -or 1 �L or t ory rio o: t�o io � 6 0 t h t 01 al ntJr. 1 .~.e.u~ �a�, . It ht ) . a tl it'.o "' the rc.-1 0 th I.,Q l ct of tl xpa �er ' ;.> �1: fo - f md, -~-r er ~ ,,ou. c ua y I ordc or .u ing th<'lt c U~'~' vic und r sections 7 r d 11 of op1 blic . ct .�o. 11~. � ) tn~t ., u ( e t e Cc_;.;o if I � r t i.tc �pr~t t'l t 0 1 (�t cit rov S . O.it $ C'" ~o . 112 i n th ir t i ct it ral n � llo v r , ... 1 '? / 316
� - 13 � . 1 . t.: a� the rcy of th ol � .ten 1e , it 0~ n . p s ~ v a d -- ... fro th� court � .t s sny f en this n t not po cf' !ty l' r c f cla m for nd the C lldc or of nt rn l venu nia
:11 .. � 4- 1 et -f 12 � n of io _ 7 pu � ic lso 'ull v. u. � ppos:ln h � p ad/ n y i t. a � t. f c �� ... f for rr t ty �1 s1 ruling, order or deci io t C 11 etor j ta t t o ld tl proper r ll e o of lnt r l r to ct o cl i for :refun I Co . � t d $. ll ct � xport to - 19 uch - t r ~P i l 1 w � t r 318
� 211 � .. 15 .. , . ca a d id o A r.1.l 22; .l.W OS upo1 t! 0 ,;oil ctor of !nter l . d c . du'y cl _: llS r fun a 0 d ,;u cr i pi � iu.ott � i 6 v ur ' p i , a- ....... . � ao f :.&.C t:ru t X x. t J.he lyin to� cla nct i l a :r fr 0. u 'I cifi lly �ijoi ),;,..d ..;y 1 pon hfii ol tor .J.., c � � . .:..nv .'.. ~ 1 matter of ic c"' - to ,.. 1� ici l eo .�1u. i OJ i ispatc'�1 i t .. t r fp !c ... t�an � nr: s v nt, t ut f ;r t' ... ~ of a �lOX' 0\/ I', t. cir� . ht r-r s. r un ic fo. s. ,..;) ir _ t 11.-p Y-I: .,.o v r th.!s ci 1 ed� fo-re - j ri ri m t I j~c .g hi .iti . al d .n nee ry lo:. i I i lt 0 td 1.' i. il u� i i r �i df av i - .)lil �o t:.1 t xp i! ord�r In~ r c;;. I. cl� f X I' f';jnd one y () tna "t ._r , rc co L~ tli ~ r z., y f .l.'ny a. .L ..-tr .lv . .plain id offici tr r i ... .L $ foz: 31.9
.. � 6� � � 21 ~ , er 1 ti n of dut or .or in o et.e , � U dou t dly. h axpay r is fr 0 v i hi a lf o ch J: m y u. er tho provi 0 s f h i inistr 1 Co or th c; vil o rv1e 9 in. r t r qui th X Y r g l ng . x- �i g ju vr l? hl i~ t f l. c -- & 0 t 0 r �un p rh ... 0 r �- dJ.C 1 . i iss 1 . ry \.t l l � 'i t d n 1 -� ally i it itvolve orr 0 l t . \. ic s b t ntial in c ~c..t .1c 0 �li V$ wa illog lly r r:ron ou �ly - ov.:r � � �xa o�� th .::1 1n th for of t xe .by t � t i J.S rt in eno rh to t xp ye 0 i fo i fin - of iJl :r ln i 0 c 0 of Int rn 1 nu 0 la� � for r fu n y to fin OlJ t r� t a 0 ct an xp n~i 0 co :t''t liti t on r � l 1h vor. he OS uld ... b ve f nt i tX 00 l ct. d. fr itho t t. of~ 1 .of in � at� � orney' c It or " .p �for t py i cl s th co t J� l ' until c ro t 0 ld � at
� - - 1 ., .. 1 � e on - ni nc =-iv r t go s gna � n f � f t l t ul . .lilt OG lt , i r0 t l on 7 �� l l f t o. l l � �t -l to o ce in lac .. rul' ci 0 d f '\,, ~0 t is l for r f or s t Q � h."' it � t ti 1 ... t r 2 0 eri pt on ~ th f t h h ol ct t ~o .�� f c� J1 c :or' of - r i. r 31 a d 33?. of th G 0 im on pr scri >ed "..'. r � - ss t nd c 1 c i n ta:xe ou j �ei c � ul b 1ol � t.at r ta "f d l� of -!' t 10 y ars t t nt , a XC t�on stou d be m d ... th of h t thirt� y r o fix ~ r $ tion 1 of ep blic A "' .~o. 1 2~ . e i:r ly t th i cret Ol n ' C0r1 I �Oi co h ll...ctor 0 rn l � ~ hold th t he ttl in~ pr u t i I ... ' 1 it. r to h \.lOll 1I t � f pay, n r v il a 7 10 lie e \ iO e 112 0 it \ � in � \ h t h f 1 ur h p\ f ''I \
� , 322
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TETRA PAK PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2831)
- MA. CORAZON GREGORIO, as represented by Virgilio A. Abogado v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5863)
- CTA Case No. 2820 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2820)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GEORGE A. TALAMAYAN, JR.(CTA Case No. OC-021)
- POLYMER PRODUCTS (PHIL.), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8299)
- STRAIGHTARROW CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 12008)
- PHILIPPINE BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 398)
- SOLID-ONE MILLS, PHILS., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1562)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.