[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40109
[ G. R. No. 40109. July 13, 1934 ]
EUGENIO TESTA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MAXIMO DE VERA DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bulacan________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement of costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 197472, September 07, 2015
- G.R. NO. 161942, October 13, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 219598. August 07, 2024 ](957 Phil. 299)
- G.R. No. 169899, February 06, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 84048. February 15, 1990 ](261 Phil. 470; 87 OG No. 32, 4565 (August 12, 1991))
- [ G.R. No. 101706. September 23, 1992 ](288 Phil. 993)
- G.R. No. 173333, August 13, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 64948. September 27, 1994 ](307 Phil. 219)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.