CTA Case No. 2863 (Resolution)
&
COURT OF TX APPEALS FJC OF THE PHILIPPINES QUEZON CITY
ESTATK OF THE DECEASED DAMFIERH Y BANCHEZ. MLFONSG UMIRKZ DE
CRMEN BRIAS DANPIERRE Executr ix-Petitioner
- versus - C..A.CASNC.2863
INT RNAL REVENUE. THE COMISSIOR O Respondent.
RESOLUTION
Acting on the Motion To Dismiss" filed by
counscl for petitioner on Auguot 2. l979 on the
ground thet the eatete and inheritence tax assess-
ments involved in this case have already been
settied because petiticner evailed of tax amnesty
under Presidential Decree No. 370. and there being
no objection on the part Gt reapondent. the said
motion is hereby SRANTED.
Accordingly. let this Case he aismissed and
considered closed and terminated.
SO ORDERED
uezon City. August 15.1979.
0 Crnraertefec CONSANTE Associate Judge C ROALUIN Acting Presiding Judge AMANTE LLDR
10 0
More in CTA Resolutions
- PERCEPTION GAMING, INC. v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8449)
- CTA Case No. 3132 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3132)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. HALEIWA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, NICHOLSON C. SANTOS and JOSEPHINE CHEN (Unit 1207 World Trade Exchange Building 125 Juan Luna Street, Binondo, Manila) (316 A Bautista St., Quiapo, Manila) -AT LARGE-(CTA Case No. O-1010)
- DIOSDADO RAVARRA, MONIQUE SUNTAY, MICHAEL SUNTAY, CHRISTOPHER BARETTO, ANTONIO DE LA FUENTE, JOSE DE LA FUENTE, GERARLD DE LA FUENTE, JOEL MARTINEZ, VICTOR FLORES, LIBERATO VILLEGAS, NEMESIO JARONAS, ANNIE PANLILIO and EFREN ORDO??ES v. NELSON A. TAN, in his capacity as Acting Commissioner of Customs, EMELITO V. VILLARUZ, District Collector of Subic Bay, and Hon. RONALDO ZAMORA, in his capacity as the EXECUTIVE SECRETARY of the President of the Philippines(CTA Case No. 5739)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOLDEN HARVEST GLOBAL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 635)
- BAP CREDIT BUREAU, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9570)
- CTA Case No. 4377 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4377)
- BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (PHILIPPINES), LIMITED, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9998)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.