[ G. R. No. 41343. September 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41343. September 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41343
[ G. R. No. 41343. September 01, 1934 ]
SIMEON RAMOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.LUISA CENTENO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Ilocos Sur_________, dated the _________15th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instance against the defendant.
It is further ordered that _________the plaintiff___________ recover from __________the defendant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- A.M. No. 17-12-135-MeTC, April 16, 2018
- G.R. No. 146611, February 06, 2007
- [ G.R. No. L-19360. July 26, 1963 ]
- [ G. R. No. L-11092. September 30, 1958 ]
- [ G.R. No. 63438. July 15, 1987 ](236 Phil. 71)
- G.R. No. 241872, October 13, 2021
- G.R. No. 223844, June 28, 2017
- [ G.R. Nos. 128088 & 146639. January 31, 2001 ](403 Phil. 613)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.