[ G. R. No. 39399. May 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39399. May 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39399
[ G. R. No. 39399. May 10, 1934 ]
GAVINO ESCALONA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. SEVERINO M. BUAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tarlac________, dated the __________8th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from__________the appellant__________ the sum of __P40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 217872, April 26, 2017
- [ G.R. No. L-4819. July 22, 1952 ]
- [ A.M. No. 2009-23-SC. February 26, 2010 ](627 Phil. 516)
- [ G.R. No. 134121. March 06, 2003 ](446 Phil. 881)
- [ G.R. No. 204589. November 19, 2014 ](747 Phil. 552)
- [ G.R. No. 187188. June 27, 2012 ](689 Phil. 589)
- [ G.R. No. 140203. January 31, 2002 ](426 Phil. 168)
- A.C. No. 11668, July 17, 2017
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.