CTA Case No. 2444 (Decision)

c: ~ l ' CF. BF PHlLIPl'. '!!.~~ Col I ' TAX .\PP.!!...\L8 q,, �-<tN en v "" .t u - ... � ... �'' X� � � � � � � � l l c i.)'~ity . s at;~ent of t~1e v . X"'"' i $~�{ ir.g th !!J h . eel ion d nt sionP. of ::u to ~ lLbl '" � 1971. h l <h. 9 it ~nd f� .id VP 1ol 1 n f u out " ,.1 :..3, 196~ . t ~ e o.r" r : ivf)d t t ,. Olt.. ~f 1anil nd . i ch !' g he ~- ~ CH:: 0 co J.sti ... of two {2) ( ll 4..-..-. e tt ck .. :t s � (f �~ t �X ... nwa.t .�, .ni er by tb of ,;u' .s, ti i %, 0 b h~l . of t v $ .l . ~"!� .toq ...~:t in. d1d in ~ l t ~ t e: ~6 19 '141 ' 117

c 11 10 c nfu 1 c y �. 1 1 y � c 0 �l � 1 f () e ce, 10 ..ouz � 11 8

- 1 c ') i r n t 0 119

- .. ... � i

e t �at of fe1 h; ~ad t t , Ctlr Oa h sto ( � 6 d~ $ 1' !ne . .... .co im os ~ by .tespo d nt Com~issi n<t&r of t.l$tom he cl �on o � .:ui .. ,eti educ .- of ... ... iQr of eet on l 'J � h rl � nd �~ st . s ";od . � 121 .

� - � � 1� � J ~~- . 7 122