[ G. R. No. 39527. July 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39527. July 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39527
[ G. R. No. 39527. July 07, 1934 ]
MATIAS YUSAY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ANSELMO PEÑALOSA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________11th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 88168. August 30, 1990 ](267 Phil. 321)
- [ G. R. No. 9181. September 29, 1915 ]
- G.R. No. 177526, July 04, 2008
- A.C. No. 10185, March 12, 2014
- G.R. NO. 150477, February 28, 2005
- [ G. R. No. 31012. September 10, 1932 ]
- A.M. No. P-23-105 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 18-4848-P), May 28, 2024
- G.R. No. 250981, July 20, 2022
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.