[ G. R. No. 40178. July 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40178. July 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40178
[ G. R. No. 40178. July 07, 1934 ]
DOLORES VAZQUEZ DE ARROYO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MARIANO B. ARROYO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the defendant in both instances.
It is further ordered that ___________the plaintiff__________ recover from __________the defendant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- A.C. No. 9917, January 14, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 174462. February 10, 2016 ](780 Phil. 563)
- [ G.R. No. 179161. January 22, 2010 ](624 Phil. 602)
- [ A.M. No. 3086. May 31, 1989 ](255 Phil. 623; 87 OG No. 3, 454 (January 21, 1991))
- [ G.R. No. 63370. November 18, 1985 ](224 Phil. 210)
- G.R. NO. 159457, April 07, 2006
- G.R. NO. 172118, April 24, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 32948. November 01, 1930 ](G.R. No. 32948)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.