[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]
G. R. NO. 35898
[ G. R. NO. 35898. May 04, 1934 ]
TOMAS CABRERA, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, BRIGIDA BELLO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _____________the appellee__________ recover from the __________the appellant__________the sum of _________P40.00_________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 199451. August 15, 2018 ](838 Phil. 749)
- G.R. No. 134368, February 08, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 183094. September 22, 2010 ](645 Phil. 434)
- [ G.R. No. 198647. November 20, 2017 ](820 Phil. 928)
- G.R. No. 132088, June 28, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-25604. April 30, 1969 ](137 Phil. 893)
- G.R. No. 258730, August 18, 2025
- [ G.R. NO. 159938. January 22, 2007 ](541 Phil. 138)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.