[ G. R. No. 39499. June 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39499. June 04, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39499
[ G. R. No. 39499. June 04, 1934 ]
THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER VS. BERTA ABAD ET AL. CLAIMANTS, BERTO CASTILLO ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLANTS, IAN CASTILLO 1.0 ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Pampanga__________, dated the__________8th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 32797. November 05, 1930 ](G.R. No. 32797)
- [ G.R. No. L-33213. June 29, 1979 ](180 Phil. 141)
- [ G.R. No. 153886. January 14, 2004 ](464 Phil. 525)
- [ G.R. No. 179024. May 30, 2011 ](664 Phil. 590; 108 OG No. 15, 1634 (April 9, 2012))
- [ G.R. No. L-49069. June 22, 1983 ](207 Phil. 591)
- [ G.R. No. 248382. July 28, 2020 ](878 Phil. 567)
- [ G.R. NO. 171532. August 07, 2007 ](556 Phil. 178)
- G.R. No. 194606, February 18, 2015
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.