[ G. R. No. 37729. June 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37729. June 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37729
[ G. R. No. 37729. June 11, 1934 ]
ALEJANDRO VILLAGRACIA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. CIRIACA VILLAGONZALO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cebu________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the defendants-appellants in both instances.
It is further ordered that the __________plaintiff-appellee__________ from the __________defendants-appellents__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 188760, June 30, 2020
- [ G.R. No. 197315. October 10, 2012 ](697 Phil. 265; 109 OG No. 35, 5907 (September 2, 2013))
- A.M. No. P-17-3746, August 28, 2019
- G.R. No. 129505, January 31, 2000
- [ G.R. No. 144244. November 11, 2005 ](511 Phil. 209)
- G.R. No. 173861, July 14, 2014
- [ G.R. No. 127536. February 19, 2002 ](427 Phil. 532)
- A.M. No. MTJ-01-1365, August 09, 2001
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.