[ G. R. No. 40981. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40981. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40981
[ G. R. No. 40981. June 06, 1934 ]
MARIA ARZABAL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES , VS. SANTIAGO FOSTER ET AL., DEFENDANTS, MARIANO DONATO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________31st__________ day of _________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellee_________ from the __________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 541. December 02, 1901 ](G.R. No. 541)
- [ G.R. No. L-38786. December 15, 1982 ](204 Phil. 577)
- G.R. NO. 153726, March 28, 2007
- [ A.M. MTJ No. 04-1526 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 01-1001-MTJ). February 02, 2004 ](466 Phil. 284)
- [ G.R. No. L-31255. May 31, 1982 ](199 Phil. 363; 80 OG No. 39, 5161 (September 24, 1984))
- G.R. No. 174462, February 10, 2016
- [ G.R. NO. 136388. March 14, 2006 ](519 Phil. 585)
- [ G.R. No. 10019. March 29, 1916 ](G.R. No. 10019)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.