CTA Case No. 4403 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE P HILIPP I NES COURT OF TAX APPKALS QUE ZON CIY. Y HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner~ - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4403 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. >~---- - - - - - - - )�! RE S OLUTION Acting on petit i oner ' s motion filed on March 19~ 1992 for withdrawal of the petition for review in the above-entitled case on the ground that the deficiency tax involved herein has already been paid even prior to the issuance o f the deficiency assessment under RTR No . 7334 03 dated October 6~ 1981 and Confir mation Receipt No . A-0180821 dated October 7~ 1 9 8 1 as shown in the memorandum for Deputy Commissioner Eufracio D. Santos dated February 3~ 1992 recommend i ng the ca nce l l ation o f the assessment which recommendat i on was eventually approved by said Deputy Commi ssioner~ photostat copy of which is attached t o said motion as Annex A, we find the motion to be in order. ACCORDINGLY, the "Motion To Withdraw Petition" filed by petitioner is GRANTED. Let this petition 144
RESOLUTION - � CTA CASE NO. 4403 - 2- for review be considered withdrawn and this case deemed closed and terminated. SO ORDERED. Quezon City~ Metro Manila~ April 9~ 1992. Q., ..... C2.. O....Jt. ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge ST, L A DADIVAS-FA cting udge Judge 145
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2137 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2137)
- MSCI HONG KONG LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9661)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SND99 FOOD CORPORATION and DANILO P. VITAN, JR. No 18 Caras De Andalucia, Visayas Ave., Culiat, Quezon City (At Large)(CTA Case No. O-848)
- CTA Case No. 4604 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4604)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. FAIVO PASCUAL BARTOLOME(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-113)
- ROBIN MITRA, as represented by Virgilio A. Abogado v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5868)
- CTA Case No. 1604 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1604)
- THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. JADE BROS FARM AND LIVESTOCK, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1566)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.