CTA Case No. 225 (Resolution)
PIFPU�LIC OF TTTfl; PHTUPPT F..S CvLi l' UF '1 AX AP.PJ:..AU, i.�.i.NlLA \ ~ ;c:LJEPi r E ~::IBEH -H.c~cESSI "] COJ J! i,Ty , r etiti oner ' - versus - C. I . A. CASE I'Ju. 225 COt .1�.�ISSIOHi.H CF ClJSTOL1S , Hespondent . x- - - - - - - - - - - - - -x li. E S C L u T J. u !-~ For reasons stated in the "J.,otion 11 filed by counsel for petitioner on February 7 , 1957 , to withdraw the petition for review in the above - entitled cas e , and there 0eing no obje ction on \ the part of counsel for respondent , the same is hereby granted , with costs against petitioner. SC Ct>JJEdED. lanila , February 16 , 19~7 . ~~ .Presidinc1 Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2565 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2565)
- CTA Case No. 3673 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3673)
- CTA Case No. 1923 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1923)
- REGUS SERVICE CENTRE, PHILIPPINES B.V. - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10124)
- CTA Case No. 3832 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3832)
- CTA Case No. OC-2749 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. OC-2749)
- CTA Case No. 3698 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3698)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8708)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.