[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39957
[ G. R. No. 39957. July 06, 1934 ]
MARIANO MARCELO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. CANDIDA ROBLES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________30th__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 146082, July 30, 2004
- G.R. Nos. 137408-10, December 08, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-6483. November 27, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 166516. September 03, 2009 ](614 Phil. 256)
- [ G.R. No. L-32390. December 28, 1973 ](153 Phil. 681)
- G.R. No. 233321, December 05, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 116216. June 20, 1997 ](340 Phil. 634)
- G.R. No. 178090, February 08, 2010
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.