CTA Case No. 2357 (Decision)
~, (I ~� ' l - ��� �7 I � � - � - - - � ~- ~� X c y ;
., :)7 ~ .. 2 - 255
�� , . 7 rp i n rr 1 1�e l � yr b� � c ce r f - y un � ��� �� s ��� n � 1 � .� y t X ly, 6. � l f v t t c- i p t l 256
�7 i .. ... � 19� �� 7, 1 � � � l 1 y c- 1 1� cl � .. 1 � c 25 7
�~ 1 258
.. - l l er clfi ~ !t c 11 f np11 i l er in no ~,i~C'H:Q � .tt c l �.s ..x l� ull h v J.t "'I .1 Ut:: tc c y he . 11 pi E ul fh .. l , .... ud.t �fr. t , p - � i Juty ., n '� f l s �. '1 U%!' en %9 � ~ us i r... - u � r p - ;. or i ~ i<:: '-h r i .c t(:;Cl- by ,(? c s l. ' c ly. t~ inv . f'\ 1 y ..... � i h a. u- Ju- .- (.,. .. c v� r of rn n.l r � 1.� 2 6r � 1 1974� t a.r ; t mp t tc � - " -~. c in nc i � r voic ic ~ t �c hy . "'h ,. n I .. g 1 ( 1~ E:d l o� c r: if. (td tc� u c lt" c ct. �� s �1 n t .L~' l "'�� f I h >.� I 2. ,.. �. ~n ll,- �"' p ,.. .�1n 25 9 ,
~.. . ,... 7 - 1- .1 t u r rlc t d ln h 11 fn le b h. uppli ~'�� any� 1 .. � �� t 11 it � xh �� ' . ) 2. p t e �� l . l ~ i. ,., ic f cl 1 1 ~ ( .. . iJ ... c 'f::t~ d l:>'j J1 i t n~ L t a !: of 11 . 11 . ) 1 C:,tl nrtmt r �h � t� c -+.:!. tl .t it I ) t n us n:erch '2� . t 0 s fi s r. tn 1 ;e c f e � tt ('; f th i le n f im� rt t? s !.lbjee to r uty � tFtt J/h t: t'G ~ .,rt f �cu ."'to. 1� - c . t tc-.:.1 . uc: t-h a tel l "' :1 "' il t ': .. c ,. : I ! t. . " OJ:'IO n t t:t ch ) \. :r d to oJ�c ct t � 5� �""e\...-. , 2'!' + r t ip.p ....!. OY'�; alt' n aU �lfZ <: 3orc u c . thorit l . tt: � GU � Cu v~lu-- .~ p tee f 1 cl ( 26 0
o r~r - � �Te/h ~ ... 8 - in ~ tion, th- , th r f r , h ne d t vail f h � c .1 ti n v , :11htch is th f m rk t val pr v �1 ng t he t� an 9 t r fr 11 p t h s m , 1�k �nd f imp rt d rticl , as c by t f Cu t � a n the P r f th diff nt ilip i tic t ch h fie r .. s u d by th Cu t ut itt 118 d t b1 valu f h~ i p rted ticle ) in cc rd nc with the xc ti n pr v d- f r n r cti n 201 f th T r"ff d Cu ~ t ms � (p. � r n mf sp n nt. ) I r pha i , h v r , s r p n n hi - lf st s ' c. nee h imp rt ti n in qu ti n ccurr d i 196 , h f (:' ct � n 201 ef riff nd u t c ap 11 in i c nt xt i r � 34, d !l2i -C U th nd t ry c t 0 ff c ly up n its pr ulg t� n 1972o ( � 6 , - 0 n um f I' h nd nt.) c n umpt v lu nd/ r th -c 11 �nf r t� v lu h - ba i t>f th . bl v lu f n i - p rt d rticl ubj c to ff n Cu t f uty, r ct 2 f h T c s intr d c o.ly s n ' ndm nt t t G 1 by 261
�2 7 - � � ll c ly � h if u 1 X1 c � � ' n 1 n h c f ch -n } ch 1 t 26 2
�crs r <N - ' T� � 10. 2357 -1 t e ct� n 2( 1 f t h - r�f nd vust s Code , a m nd-d by .t"'re s i � nti al D~ c re N � 34 , as 11 g d by respon <=nt . it is t be stress d that the Com- missi ne r f Cus toms ts rE uired b)' 1 �J to pub li sh suc h l "st of v lu-s fr om tie1 t tim.... He does not n1y h ve to s c ert in r.d -stablis h the home c n... sumpti on v lu , but must ls pub!i�Q sue li sts of v 1 s fr m t ime to time. 0ublic pol icy \mul d s m to requ: re th t im- port � rs be info r~ i.n v c of t1e ome c on ump8 cion v ue s , or inf � m t i n v ...1 es , f articles -x� po. te d to t!1.e .Phil pp � nGs . Th � s ~.~ould pr6vent un c rt inty, let al on th - x- c e f pure l y pers nal iscre i n, sp cially � n t n part of cu t t S appr isers, in th rna er f t .e c ertai ment and dete r~ in ation f th pri c - or valu of imported r i cl s. urther . or , if 1-:-,p tGrs rc inf rm d in �vance of the home c nsumption v .lu-s o informa ton v lue of rticl xp rted t o h Philippine , hey c an pr erly dec - 1 r- th du tia bl v � lu e s of t hei sh" pments n t hu ~oid the hE vy pen lties imposed for i s cl r i n, "f not de ~y s i n h - r l -as of g od f om c ustons 26�3
10 � . 7 ... 11 - c h 1l f tl � y -� ( fc t f � .) 1 � 12 h , 1t h 1 b' n q � e1 al e s- � p d f t b ... f n i")r l � � 1 11 ns ,. f", e .. Co ,u �. tl" " .. n 1 ~ n oxpor~ v lne ilt' p t f tt lr i n, .h 1: cl l' 1? v- -e l:l 1 . ~>r~ a i l in{.:, .1-l~ i.m rt rl! f h~ � imp t.Gd -- -J-lcl r r: r "'u cl p fc r d. 1 c
7 - 12 ... l cf - � tc - ni r'n 1 u. n f 51 ip- u nC � co t� hl i~ c c v f nh c;� l c c c - s � c r ifi y t i 1 t h lly t. l I ~ ~ric - 3' j �ct.l r ,c .h 1� d of Jr I n .. v 1 .,, ) , lo , -~ 2 �.; 1 � ?. .~. 2 65
�� 2 1 -1 2 66
I . ., � cr�~r..~ C. T . ,. . ~. �t '1 � 2' ~J7 .. 14 - 1 t i p l, t h j isd c 1 n t�in h lly, l dy y .. l n nly lt: t . i c ~t: ~ .... 1 ,. ,._X IJ Jj f tl .... c 10': t~ b(:. (' 1 Q, \y �-r ny ~d ~ L n 1 v rr> yr.. - nf uld t. t. av � b� ba.:c :r� d lrr- .dy ') Sucti n n1 1 nt � cl t. . f :r i nt n 1 de i.., lr l, . ilL. :tn t rm a f tn cun � 91 l � ~ .� )\ lri .h r. l � gn v nue � t 1 f<;r by t'd e. t' t 2G7
cd �2 7 - 15 .. 1- 11 1, � �/} 2 68
More in CTA Decisions
- ORICA PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2336)
- ORICA PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10152)
- EXCEL CONCRETE LOGISTICS INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10695)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1018)
- CTA Case No. 6296 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6296)
- IMS HEALTH PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 445)
- MELCO RESORTS LEISURE (PHP) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE [consol with 10052](CTA Case No. 10029)
- EMPIRE AUTOMATION PHILIPPINES INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10470)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.