CTA Case No. 758 (Decision)
' . ''� \'\0,. ., ' �' /- f 1'\EPU l TC F 'l P IJT T �, '['\' (_; U uJtJ (' I ~ fd 1 ..t.; d < � QL ~zo~ CITY \' ersus C. T � � CAS o. 7S8 CO'� � 1$SIOH�R 0� CRim.t.O:o.InSd r t . DECI S I 0 N Petitioners ap;; al fro h d , ion o respondent d t .d J nu ry 2?, 1960, a:f 1r in,; t t or the oll ctor () Custo 0 11 deere inp t' rre1 ur 0 � s. eurr n y 11� and ne otia b ru'(: e ts a ountin to 3'1 ,864.$(. , for lleged viol a tion of c ntral .ank: r.:trcul r. Nos� ~w, 42 and 55, i.n ret � t!on to . etion r> t E v� d nd inl tr t~v Cod � On l~U U 16, 1956, th cla n nt's nred e s~or tn 1nt r s , 1 , w s sch t1~.t 1 i to 1eav fo Ho - \ton � St.tspee t tl of' oarry111g '. w. dollar b11 s with- ut lie nso, e !'\S ~e t d by j 1nt o;;erati e o Gu _ o s, C ntral B nk and 1-1 p..n s while h v s t th . ... nn t r . .tl 1 \i. ... p � s ~reh o the or p r on the 145 .., e rodaced n ~ t 1v re 11 t . Ho)li- . ve,.., 1t '� ... , t.�0 .1 0. d + 'l t the sho ~ he was ".le ring - re " "" ..... t ' b1.fl tor ht f t. Opon further in.vesti~- � o'll r bills , 0 ay r�... rr- nd heck of 31,ao+.s, v. rio11 k1n i th ~r ~t l. u.t 0 ere � at ~oov r d 1l ly wr: � ped wi �:1 eel oph,n en craftily swn 1n the sole 0 h1 .. shoes . Con- 548
I� f' " 2- e u n 1 , t h bi ~ ' - , order an ~hecks r � tz d f' r v1 ..t :.: r.m or 20, 12 n _ 55, 1n ~ _ation t c 1 n (l ~(f) ~ b is d n1 r t1v~ Cod .. � or roe d "t nd x-w 1, (i1.. eu� an<i .. su t1t t . y t.e h r in cl tm nts (p ~ 1 ;. Cust l' e. . f the s 1:zu . pro d1n . , t h C 1 . c or t Cu. :rod ion . or 0 .. h~ r ..... "1 ' o J ord~r � nd 0 1 e a t v r of � ed t1tton r tee.). .C...,?, 9~'H'";J' � !I) 1. " ~4"1' d f u """.,_'. '-t pp l d the c � o t h s "':m r � ponr:t t r .i . a of' h1 t1 n~es th qu~s io of ~ r r v:t w 1le thtrty- aY pet1od pr BC b~d 1 I , u 1e et .o. 1125. ) at 0 . 1 ,. n�tl t t ti ne r 1 oti to B ide th ""POnd nt th ort t \Ill h th - t e ... 'r lb Ci:rct 1 of Cireul r � 0 hi w 1 pl t y Cixcu l 1' Ro . 4? and 1 t r � nd d ' CirouL.r o � ~ 11 lit . ineurr - h reuna. e te o. ). b 2- 3 ... ' ( :J } � ~lt 1' >... �...# ) . / ' ,, 549 '(':� ~ ( r. .' t( I i:,t ''I i '1-
' .� D ,c; I 0!' - c c/'p " " � 758 n r olut. o e b r 10, 19f2, tht C ' rt held 1 � e r s u 1o o... he c to . . t os ~ t .e dE!<! ..,. rm ,,r respor n A.Od to dL iss t ro ;, 1tur " to t c 1d r J in h d eeicion 0 e er:rts. 'hi #a. s1 t ~ b $15 t �n r�CO!'d � '1 ~ ~!lAS 1.s 1 .or .:>�~r d t~-"'r ..iru1ti r 1n this re: t~ 0 d � l1~t .Rr r n( t s in .,.. ...trh ~ e p t i e .~ t re � � I\ � 1� ~.~, f,', r:t 0"1 � ondent on Rtm rv � . , , r d 11 ed by re pon J �t 1 or d t- �d J�ch ,. 1 19"'0 <. � 7, Cu to. s r t�c . ). of .ni 1 s l'Y ~ d on . e 1t 1rm r e o t S e d t to!'Js r e.). , 2, 1 ( 0, p ~ t i t .,_ nn t in !'I.tan pet1t1o or r~view ( � 1, CT~ r c � � ..o �nt1 th n ..jb i.' of" .Janu. ry ?�1, 12, 19 0 <:nd di th~ it terrup- tl ea 1o !'f otio r .�.. s t ier. 0 J., m '. . ir ( ) d lap � re er ed �Y 1th1 th p r 0 ;2,. t 0 a P u .1.e c . � 550 ....
. ' \ .. 1 \: -......... ,.- '� H - o c:~nm ~- CA1:-r> no. 7'8 - 4- r no� e ~o o the s cond :t s ue. Th lPft lll .'1 o t ' tor~eitur i con ested on h~ ro . ~ h t C ntral I\ B n Ciro~lnr$ o � 20, 42 nd ' ' were not 1ssu d in ce�ord3tlce w th l.nw, hence, 'l ..ay re null and vo1 � I is also ar ed t h the ~r .~ ntian d clrc 1 1 11 1 u d '1 t p lty i no forfe1 � ur but tt nolty p. ovided in Sect1 � 4 of tb Centr 1 8 k r:t ( H P' lte ~ ct No . 26$) wbi ah e ot be l 1 lly 'e d n o ~ sio _ to ~ s u o . . s ...11 I he e se of' .. r dad r p! st:rar.o v. rr c. T. � No . 174, "'urao l+, 195'~, e af ' 1.:r�,.~ or.~. t .1 1 �$ 'e i , . R. l o .. 11075', "utF 3~. , lQEO, this co, t h 1 : 1 -, :~\I ~ ' ~1 ., 1-~�
I ..... r :'' ' ' .' 4 \ I 1.1 r-: "" l ., &. JJ't - C A ,.,.,E .0. 758 .. s- ed rol'ln., X X X X t~E>l'e r1 X l� t"tn nr.> r ir-- rn11r. � h~�n eub- o sa1�1 on to d PArt .~. ro1 t.le above-quo '' 552 .� , , ,1 lo;.-
~; .,, ' .~ 1- ,. . I ..' "" ' . . I ~: ' 'I' � ' )~. tl Cl ION ... - 6- C!rA CAS NO. 75i t - ~ntr 1 . nk Cir- et1 t1 �:m s' co y C ntr. ~a~ Circ~.nr o. 133 bu 0 l 1b i � l!O 1 ~c. !l:�a b t11 t b tween ~.ntr 1 ll~ Ct:re l;.�r tJQ � 20 end 133. 'he fortter r stl" c n r ~ r. xeh n ; th la t r for 1 r. xen nt? :;;ort � the I 13C �}")� ~1 d rrcr is :reby ~ ezon ..!it , Janu � y .3, 1 67. (,)il'd. > 0 �A�� t. u r �i.' 't' PrA~ldin J ge ( Sr <J � ) : "'T , f 3 0 � ., L.,, l1 ": .� eoe1ate Jud e \ r .... ,' �'fl..,
More in CTA Decisions
- AVON PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8378)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SONOMA SERVICES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2467)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOLE PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1495)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED(CTA Case No. EB 1853)
- ANTHONY ORTILE TUASON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1700)
- CTA Case No. 1855 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1855)
- CTA Case No. 5215 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5215)
- MISSOURI SQUARE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8688)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.