[ G. R. No. 40926. August 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40926. August 04, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40926
[ G. R. No. 40926. August 04, 1934 ]
MAKABAYAN TAXICAB CO., INC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ESMERALDA VERSAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________6th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 177420, October 06, 2010
- [ G.R. Nos. 212656-57. November 23, 2016 ](800 Phil. 781)
- G.R. No. 108338, April 17, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 204605. July 19, 2016 ](790 Phil. 276)
- [ G.R. No. L-35384. November 28, 1972 ](150-C Phil. 383)
- G.R. NO. 137232, June 29, 2005
- [ A.M. No. P-12-3032 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 11-3652-P]. February 20, 2013 ](704 Phil. 251)
- [ G.R. No. 186131. December 14, 2011 ](678 Phil. 831)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.