[ G. R. No. 39114. June 12, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39114. June 12, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39114
[ G. R. No. 39114. June 12, 1934 ]
FELIX A. FERNANDEZ, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. ISIDRO ARADANAS, ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________17th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with cost s in this instance against the oppositors-appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the applicant-appelles _________ from the __________the oppositors-appellants _________ the sum of P_ 40.00 __, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 35302, 35303. April 05, 1932 ](G.R. No. 35302, 35303)
- G.R. NO. 157718, April 26, 2005
- [ G.R. No. L-8446. September 19, 1955 ]
- [ G.R. No. 208740. November 19, 2014 ](747 Phil. 607)
- A.M. NO. P-03-1678, June 26, 2006
- [ G.R. No. 87245. April 06, 1990 ](263 Phil. 171; 87 OG No. 35, 5043 (September 2, 1991))
- [ G.R. No. 213961. January 22, 2020 ](869 Phil. 98)
- [ G.R. No. L-38685. March 31, 1977 ](166 Phil. 661)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.