CTA Case No. 942 (Decision)
... ... 1 paf f r h� 1 ll ro "\ -1 p rt �or 2, 50? ,6 3.1?, nt1n th 9 7,7?2 i r- 1 c ll or 10 r 1 Co t nd n h ,. rt ~ o oo bu rett c tr s to wh ot 1 or ul th 1t on -� 434
� I - - , 1- 435
- 3- ). � ( 1- . r r � l r r ' 0 1 '/ ' '/2 1 � I 436
1) Cl l l - o. 9lt2 c��� c . - 4- to various c1 r 1 or bi. l' . .etit1o t' oct l s ...... 1 is no h < 1p or 1 1 th i t nn <lit tH1 to t ll 1 Xa d e nst 1 by n� h ~~1 .;..JUC:: ~ I. c d~ d ~ .r 01" no / ' on r 1 l imp rt r ...r 1 J. to ceo I s 1 r 11 11 .h ~ x. n t ..e oth .... h!U'ld,. L� o .n r :r +n 'l' �h c Sn tc i "1- t 111 or t ~� "�t10ll #) th' ation o d , �� r 0 1 .t .n l "� 1 , a therein, �� d into "... . th tyarett nuf ~,;tur rs ;;;tl' �~ tho 0 hf. h ~�t :o d .:1ne ~ 1 l't' t 437
0 � ' '7 ( 0 t �� � e. l . } ' � ' 1 51 f � 0 '. 43 8
,. ... 0 ... ' . or l c:. ' 'i ... D .o o. r , i � , .. ~ � � .t tb cru ury cour s or u .... ; .... ... . .t� .... . t \.'I'Jo. T> t port t �. cc ..:ro t * t rc j "' ... t i t �� .... 1 0C<~Al ob co t.r i.t 11 ~ r o: 1 .. t 0 to b"'o: ., td th nse ,. .( ...... -- ,,........ .,.jj;,..,;J,_ 1 �. H1 o'th� r 00'!'� s in 1 en to .1 h or h f tn ~in.� b . � 1 t 439 -.
� .. 7- ly p ovid t �d th 1 ! 1 1 r 'o oco, ot l 1 tit1on .r1 (!OV .1 h t . -w r a r rt 1 0 1"0 th e would n tb obllg tion 1 u n tit t u.rt - O'~l th r y b r to th . ~n or of �h ill of .lading,. te or t b trt r p ~rmi�t . I 1 at is r�hi it �r r, .r or e,o 1 0 ~ ... r f 11 ot 1 1 t�on e n it tr �nsfe ) s 1gnment r n tio of h arter permit. canno b o di:r c l:r, ot b i d1r otion. r h b 11 or 1 d n t 1 dor co t on eon 1 t r nd,. 'h r tor , ot do fai h , th. Gove�rnm rtt ay r1gh lY d.1 r r th 440
., � 441
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MCKINSEY & CO. (PHILS.)(CTA Case No. EB 2540)
- HONDA CARS MAKATI, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8638)
- CTA Case No. 5527 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5527)
- UGONG TRADE & HOLDINGS INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10761)
- CTA Case No. 5399 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5399)
- CTA Case No. 672 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 672)
- MITSUBISHI CORPORATION-MANILA BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7040)
- CTA Case No. 4480 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4480)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.