[ G. R. No. 39567. July 17, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39567. July 17, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39567
[ G. R. No. 39567. July 17, 1934 ]
FELISA DOLORES AND BERNARDO SUNIO, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. BENITO SUNIO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________27th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instances against the plaintiffs-appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the defendant-appellee_________ from the __________the plaintiff-appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 215820. March 20, 2017 ](807 Phil. 720)
- [ G.R. No. 215874. July 05, 2017 ](813 Phil. 188)
- [ G.R. No. 182185. September 18, 2009 ](616 Phil. 709)
- [ G.R. No. 201830. November 10, 2015 ](772 Phil. 470)
- [ G.R. No. 113103. June 13, 1997 ](339 Phil. 605)
- [ G.R. Nos. 100376-77. June 17, 1994 ](303 Phil. 266)
- G.R. No. 139230, April 24, 2003
- [ G.R. No. L-34122. August 29, 1988 ](247-A Phil. 24; 86 OG No. 14, 2371 (April 2, 1990))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.