CTA Case No. 579 (Amended Decision)

;v qr) llKP'li.8L1L OP TH E PtHL1t'PlN 'f1 \ COURT 0~~ APPEAU. 'V"' l o/ � �o� . � 7 n n� X� � � - - ~~ - d t'-' t 1� � 0 if c � li ti1 t n � .,o it - f i ln � f or� � d 0 435

I I .. 2 - I t :L..-....,.~vli y ean U e. t ..... I t and o l d ain t t1- t J..on � - 1iPOrtde t ag;:u t withdl'n~< � tl1 &$ , e.nt st ...h~t p t io r n.d n � l 1: t o cl s . tb � � cc rin h.t. t 9 c. sid ... Th l tt ,.,......u......nd nt 1 her d r quot �d in f ul.l.; � l\t t yt: . ~ it g. Plaza '1 "ntle "it 1 is 1 I' ry tr ly y " � 436

f f I I '~ �7 I I' ( .� q . . ..,., , (' .... . , t:,2 ....., . l � 1. "'\ . -� t l "' (ttl f o . th �f"'w .W....f..,t.+ 9. t, . olut.:i o. ""f , ��:; I I a c cr�stHluenc ~ of l"ll d n.t t.l of the motion to !thd th upn . al. , peti ti o!' o 'P:t Gnted tb doc � nt:ar exhibits c nttituting i colt r- �d � videnc no � fid. ne � 1n- Th 1ttl ftft tb $ flt OC . ntary �X u bi t Wllie 1 p :r ted on ent to ao e t~ tl ~ �th J>:ewal of the a~s ~ ... � (tilfe l te.r of r~ ondent d t~d L\a ' 24 , 19 J� ,. 437

I - -. 7 c.r�� � � t r 1 . 438