[ G. R. No. 37746. June 23, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37746. June 23, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37746
[ G. R. No. 37746. June 23, 1934 ]
ANACLETO DE GUZMAN, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. IRINEO DE GUZMAN @ ESTO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________7th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________17th__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost s against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________appellee__________ from the __________appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 127625, May 31, 2000
- G.R. No. 123780, December 17, 1999
- A.C. No. 7649, December 14, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 196597. October 21, 2015 ](772 Phil. 144)
- [ G.R. No. L-13974. August 31, 1961 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-2265. April 01, 1950 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-19546. April 30, 1968 ](131 Phil. 938)
- [ G.R. No. L-6461. May 31, 1954 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.