[ G. R. No. 39942. July 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39942. July 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39942
[ G. R. No. 39942. July 11, 1934 ]
NATALIO ISIDRO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ALBERTO RIVERA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bataan________, dated the __________19th__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed with the costs against the appellee.
It is further ordered that __________the appellant__________ recover from the __________the appellee___________ the sum of P__73.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. L-9616 and 11783. May 25, 1959 ]
- [ G.R. No. 19272. January 25, 1967 ](G.R. No. 19272)
- [ G.R. No. L-14392. May 30, 1960 ]
- G.R. No. 175241, February 24, 2010
- [ G.R. No. L-37014. April 06, 1984 ](213 Phil. 553)
- [ G.R. Nos. 142901-02. July 23, 2002 ](434 Phil. 330)
- G.R. No. 182704, April 23, 2014
- [ G.R. Nos. 138358-59. November 19, 2001 ](421 Phil. 262)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.