CTA Case No. 2557 (Decision)
R~ C GC l H "" Ql LZON CIT ' �, -� ' ..,..,,.. ..".' t \/
... 2 - ... 348
- �
- - ... 'li 1 ) � � � .. It ��
-
6- ' t 0 352
.... "" * 5. 'l - 7- r , ""1 ! ' r. n 1 - )- t. J. � ar t ti 0 1 353
' � r:!57 .... .... � � ... �� � . .. � t �� - . f th� us 0 1 t1� 0 n tl 0 , 3 5 11
1 -� .�� � 355
.. ... s r h 0 71. 1- � ).
� .. . " -�
'. .t' ~ ,. l .. c� I 1 1 .... 1. ... ,. 358 -
.. 1 - t1 11 nv r t 1 � ) ,. cl i - t0 0 h .11 01 1 iff 1~ r
... 2557 .. 1
II V"", � ) 1 1 {) � ) ,. ) 0 t '} 1 n - i .... I 0 fl ch in
- 1. u t. � ('
- 57 7 ... n1 0 ' 1 1c t t - - j n ,l
.. � � n � � � j . ' .77.
More in CTA Decisions
- MINDANAO SANITARIUM AND HOSPITAL COLLEGE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8673)
- MY SANCTUARY WELLNESS CENTER, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND MARIDUR V. ROSARIO, AS BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REVENUE REGION 8A, MAKATI CITY(CTA Case No. 10664)
- CTA Case No. EB 141 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB 141)
- CTA Case No. 4985 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4985)
- SUMITOMO CORPORATION - MANILA BRANCH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10412)
- INTELLIGENT TOUCH CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2966)
- SYSTRA PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7580)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7329)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.