CTA Case No. 5036 (Decision)
--- ..... COM":-H SSlOrlER ()F U!TEP.t! !:.t CT_A_ CASE 1!0_ 5036 f-'EVENUE~ Promulgat'd � _::.. - - - - - ~-~A'f_0_91996 ~ DECISION '--.+~- 1__l_ :... -_; �~� . 1-�~-; :::~ .:-: . t:�t:~l ti�:� �r; ~r fi . ' �. i :.' ; '
DECISIOH- C.T..!. CASE 110. 5036 properties. Tlms. petitkmer�.-:: incorne t:tx return refle:ted :=J. (J.ro3:::; Inc()me I> (;~r::t_,2 4Ci_~2 r)().i);.) Le�:::;: Deductions 11 cJ.()ls!~!. 7:7 c~. ~)!) Net Lr)s::; p 11.649.~� 19.00 Less: Cr'2'dita!)le Tax 'i,i'ilithhs+::l (Ex.p-3.!1ded Wi t!lholding ) =-F�_ __,;.c:,-'-7..(.l.CJ.....:.~.~-"-:)-'-6-=-(.,_H=-) * TOTAL AMOUNT REFUNDABLE nn =P===~-==c~:~,7!~0"=-"=~"o=6"=v=~= * TO Bf APPLIED AS IAI CREDIT TO SUCCfiDIHG' I AI.ABLE YEAR.. .. C�!l J.~J.1J.gt1.3{. (-.��(.�..,. t��.1~.-�~i1�ij,::�;-+�1-<111...0Ci -pt-,���l:�:�=l-' 1t."_-1t--l;.,�-.�-.1..tt��i�.�:-:�:..tl� - tr��;:, rt�..�,�r�,��.-����-,j-jf~Yl"l�t-� ..-...i �-� "t:. . i t r-_�}.�:.:..:..t�<..-lf.-1~--,"--"�;-1-� "14 l �._::'1f.-~�--:-j-f~) !. enforce its da.irn for refund or taz credit. Re�::pondent contended Unt tile cla.irn f:)r refund i-; still It i::;; th-& f- (,1- tt��,::; ..,�;-..-..,1"'1�.�...�--lv �..- .. l�-� Lt:.>�,-,~t..�~.,::-...-:-::>t. J-l�� !�.-,�-,' ~l!;:-.:.�:.1�1�fl~r t.t�1i�f-.._.�
DECISION- C.I.A. CASE HO. 5036 -3- :t.nd to checJ~ ~.vhether c�r w=:ot. tJ.xes 'ivere actually rernitte(i to Uw Bureau. The burden r:::�f proof lies wiU1 petitioner since claims fo:::or refund :J.re in the tEtture ~)f ::J. tax exernption a.nd are therefore ���tlTT t:;,,�l --:-�-t..,..-.1�'�-� .- ,�; '�?-.-.'--�,�1-1.r:-.�.t�t"J_j_�'":�;:'.U-! .-:-1.,1..:-:-'1;�-.:-.,t..i.t�1-.:�~t�� t._t._-l>?::.:' '��.�"�1.:~.1.1�!I-l-�:~f.tlt... T-:�:-\:-.~�~'-~>-:-::�'--:-� Jr>.-.-J�-::.~1�(�--+l �at�?>:.::' r.L-��t' "P�-�.C�-� J-�l�!l"1'-� ,_ t11is c:J~::e. r>etith::rner L:dled tr:::. file the Certifica.te of Creditable �� J. ;t-:?"Ji" 1991. The i~;:::ue i::: Vlhether or not petitioner is entitled to daim for ta1r crE>dit. (::.r refund the arnount of P696.264..30 as excess incc�me f,.-,,- the -.:,cear 1991 cornprising of credit.:Jble ... �.���.1. ' 1. l'J'J 1 1ncorne T:3x Return wtt.h tlle :3.tt3.ched Audits<!. Firrt~.no~.l St3.tements (Exhs. U, U-1 to U- 12. indusivB): 2. (:e.rtific;:J.t.es ()f c:re(jit:J.l)le l!lC()tlle Ta.:{ \fllitllllel(j a.t ::ource (.EHR Fonn 174~-n for tlle vear 1qq1. . �- . I �� . 1n��Y1nw aw�I the '=:ll���,wino� tht=;. �..r �.,� s ~ .::..;.t:, '�� .,. 4 r;::.r�t::.i~!.:>(J t.3.X "J' �.,� ..- �.,� ��� -...- I V ., J� .._ ~,.,�lithht;-ld ther>?from by the follOV�ling �~�vithholding :3.gents: 'I'fi-ll.-t1�11�1(:-.1-'d�1-._flp.r� t8.,~'.P..!-1' t_:_:;�_ a. E:.elmc�nt ..~.gricorp. (Exh. A)_: p 210.00 254.0(:1 b. Lirn:Jv f:.ult H;:.l.!l(!ling._�, ~ Termim:tl. Inc. (E;1l. f.); i-. Etler-~�l>?t., ItlC. I>l1ils. (E:::tl1. c�_)_: d Henuspi".iere- Leo f:.urnett, Inc. (Exh D) vc.. L�ur�
DECISIOll- C.T.A. CASE HO. 50J6 - 4- v.r1� t.t�-!.11�1(��.l�l����-i1�1�1�o- i!. oP.tlh=: � Ta.x vVithlwld: iI J. J.�J ��� ���-� . .;:. Cow::u.mer'::; Grocery .::{ t:J.eneral Iv1erclB.ndise (Exh. E) f. }':::.se U. EstJ.)f(:() (PICO Phil.) (Exh. F) 473.. 0 0 g. Cej::1r-Young !Jptical Clinic (E:zll. G) ~;07.00 11. Fertiphil Corporation (Exll. H) 2,2SA.20 i. Agro-ivlaster::;, In(:_ (EYJl. I) ~') f C" 1!..:}Z=(l' j . F�hil pu:��((im (Exll. p �.) ). K. NorsK Hydro (l::::tiilsJ, Inc. (Exh. K) 1,2~10.00 �) c:, ,:. 1�) �:� ,:) c..-��_,() .:.a � .:...\._ l. Sugar Regulatory i�.dministrat.Lm fE.zll. L) 1~;.9,:)2.75 n1. Tdetr;:v:le Corporation (Exh. M) 2�3~~=~~52 ..)3, n. Movers ${ E-a.ggers Services_. Inc. (Ei-11. N) 16..356.60 �.)_ Parafert Corporation (Exh. 0) f; ,�-) r-�:�, i�)-�. (�-�l (..,l. p. Pllilippine Amusement f'{ Gaming ._. C()rporatlon (Exli. P) q. Int'l. .E.ulk Commodities f, ?..:"l .�.�o)�._'Ji! � �-� ;. f Handling & Tn:v:ling Corp. (EY.h. Q) 1.. 'l.��~�1;-:1�!"11.1;=--1� Lt=:.t�(-�;1-�(.1l(..;- 1-�:-:J..1�1�1Cp�� C-(i-l�I�lnt;�::--�111~i 7 - 2, l (JO.OO DYEZ (Exh. R) nd rr A.�-ift1- t,::.o ::; . (hl e;, �-� T T ._.... ~l r�..:.T:.. J. .A. '� ... ,I. ... -��.�~,� (�-�,�..-...;.1"[--�' . t'�'E~-.,...i-tl-1 . -::-) aJ i t. Orient Pa.cific Properties t~ fvlanagernent. Corp. (Exh. T) TOTAL P695.90).20 * .+: Petit.wner i:=: daumng for the credit or refund of .nt"t=..:. ,...:�16., f,,::;. .~.!... !~() .L.t�. -. - 3-. L.,;.ttep:; da.irn f�,::.r refund dated Februarv 4.. 19q �:; . ... "" ~ reo?.ived t.y� tlle e.IR on February �\ 199.~; (E~-11. "~l)_. iu1.gust 11. 199_:,. re(:eived by the BIR on August 1} 1 ::"f!"�(l 16 1 ~ .� (-l� Q-� ._-~J t\E'<.._';"._ttl . 'i.ll) -� .L - 1\.0P.... nr�t�P�.t��I�lt-~,_.P-.!" .. } (..-i(.�l ._-~}.' I 1 .� I rE>ceiv>:>d t�y the fqE on September 17_. 1993 (Eitl1. X). evidence. f,(:.t_h (:Ounsel for petiti(:.tier and respondent a~:reed to bGC
DECISION- C_l' .A. CASE HO _so�35 )- rl�o,:::. l� �-� l,'q~l'-1~1.(�.�}.:�.�!--,,::.tit'--��j�,��.�.,.�-t1;�"-�-1C--t!-.,t.h,::. 1r�-,�t�J,.:::�.�I�--1-1L1l..�C-��,';j..�-�_�1'_ �.� .!. ~� .�.!. �-� �,� rea:::(:�n c:r another t.Iwn tl:l<:=> <:latm for rdun�:l or t:Jx (:fedit ca.n be J:>.:=,titk�,ner f:::d1ed to nre~:en.~ In evi,.:lew::e its 1992 Inc�:::.tne l "F Ho1dt- "'nd r.,.tt'on v in .:.~-� r._r..'..�...:_:.. .�-----:�l-.�:--�.-:'�:.:�,-c--� ,---..-,-+1 n __ ~.i.n'�E.:-..;-:J: a.__ M__ a*".t".."�.Ouo'""t":r'fi!1!.. f 6-~..r- it~ f__~9 ...-...,...-.!...}.-.".".......,...- a.u- " __ . _ Commissioner of Internal Revenu~, CT.,A, Cas~ No. 4529, Mardi 16, 199.3: Philippine Bank of Communkations v _ Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No_ 4309, May 20, 1993; BPI Data Systems Corporation (form�-rly Filipinas Management and teasing Services, Inc.) v.
DECISION- C_T_!__ CASE HO_ 5036 -6 - Commissione-r of Internal Revenue. CTA Case .tlo_ 469 I. D~cember 6_. 1993; BPI Family Savings Bank. Ine_, v_ Commissioner of Internal Revenue. CTA Case No_ 4694, D~cember 24 1993; Anscor Hagedorn Securities. Inc _ v_ 2 Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No_ 4947, January l995; and Pasie...:.. Land Corporation v_ Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No_ 4773. inc()t:W:1 t::tx Ha.bilitv, for tha.t v.ea.r. Failure on the Dart .:A th-s- ~ Pe.titi('H>S-r tr3.s the burd.s-n of prov1ng tha.t it t:; entitled to th.e refund soug.t1t. for bec:nJ.se tax% are presurned to have been Inc. v_ Commissioner of Internal Rev~nue, CTA Case No_ 287 L lanuarv 29. 1986_] Itt:; ha.rdiv necessarv to add t.1Et.t. a-!-;. �J ~ ... refund parta.tes of the na.ture of ;:_m exernpt.ton, and the same in Uw rnost exo... llcit a.nd 17888, Oct_ 29, 196(t 25 SCRA 7)4_} C1a.1ms f�:)r refund a.re (<::rnst.ru.ed :::t.rictly ag,_,.:i.inst cla.irn;~nts since :J daim ior reiund
D~CISIGH- c_T.A_ CASE HO _)036 ~ -f- WHEREFORE,. in vie'\v ~)f the foregoing. the petiti(lrt is hereby DISMISSED hr la.ck of rnent. ,_�\ccc�rdingly, petitioner's SO ORDERED. WE CONCUR: ~---tQ.Q~ ER.NESTO D. ACOSTA ~ ..Jla.~ MAflUEL .K. GRUBA
DECISION- C_!.A_ CASt HO. 50""35 r� E v c � I rJ� Lr~ f t~ 1. . -~ A ~l - ~t-'J .!.lo. - Pr~:::ir:1tr!g: _i1J.<:ige ;�,f ..-�,nt�t 1:. T�:<"" r-,r,<::.c:,k� ..!..r-� . ~-- �-���.� =��-� .i �-� ��-�,.. J.. ,_,__.... .!. !----~---� .!.�-�
More in CTA Decisions
- THE CITY GOVERNMENT OF MAKATI, THE CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI CITY, and THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND HEAD OF BUSINESS PERMITS OFFICE v. HONORABLE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MAKATI CITY, BRANCH 59 and MACTEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-147)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8644)
- CTA Case No. 1676 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1676)
- CTA Case No. 3814 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3814)
- CTA Case No. 4128 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4128)
- SUPPLY OILFIELD & MARINE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11048)
- NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS; LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF THE PROVINCE OF AGUSAN DEL SUR; STARLITA G. RUIZ, MUNICIPAL ASSESSOR OF SAN FRANCISCO, AGUSAN DEL SUR; AND CESAR T. RUFILA, JR., ACTING PROVINCIAL ASSESSOR OF AGUSAN DEL SUR(CTA Case No. EB 1392)
- THE HONGKONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED - PHILIPPINE BRANCH v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8428)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.