CTA Case No. 2766 (Order)
H f~f't'~I.IC Of.� IHE PBI I.IPP !~ FS c;, 1l h r c f T.\X AP PE ALS QL!,,ZON Cll'Y SYSTE1�1S & BUSINSSS 'SQ,.)lP.MEl'JT C )766 � CCRPORATION , rn o .r'l. � ''v"'..� :"::>"11'' '�J' -V. � '-- Petitioner , .J.. - versus - C.T .A. C.n.SB IW . 2768 COl<'i!'-IT SS I or~R OF I NTIR ,0",.L R~ V"J NCE , C . T . A . c~sE NO . 2772 Respondent . C . T .. A. CASE NO . 2773 X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X Sl-'IITH , BELL & CO ., INC ., Petitioner , - versus - cmn:ISSIO:f'<'SR OF IIJT?RlTh.L Rr>v:'I'-.m , Respondent o X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X B~LL CARPETS , INC ., Petitioner , - versus - COHNISSI ONSR OF INT~::.l.&L RT'VSNUE , . Respondent . x ------------- -- x C . N. LOVSTED & CO . (PHILS .) INC ., Petitioner , - versus - COHNB SIONF.R OF INT"B::RlJt"L rt,. VT'NtJB , Respondent o X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X BSLL HOBART lvlAliDFACTURING , INC . 7 Petitioner , - versus - COY! :IS SI OI-r.R OF II~R NAL RSiT': l'JUE , Respondent . X -------- - ----- - X 0 RD ~ R For the reason stated in petitioner �' 11NOTION FOR .JITHDR �,vAL OF PETITION FOR RBVIS1'111 filed on JV.:.arch 16 7 1977 , a .:1d there being no obje c tion on
the part of the respondent , the said notion is herr by GRA;'L'ED � L~t the above - entitled ca:es bA considered closed and terminatedo SO 8RD :RtiiD . "'uezon City , ~pril 6 , 1977 . - C01~~ uT~:: '~ / ::- C1. ~"GIN s~oc iq.te Judge
More in CTA Orders
- PHILWEB CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10563)
- CTA Case No. 2419 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2419)
- CHERRY MAE CELESTINE, v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,(CTA Case No. 10220)
- MBM ILOILO ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (FORMERLY UDK-SP 012)(CTA Case No. 9439)
- AVALOQ PHILIPPINES OPERATING HEADQUARTERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10617)
- CHERIE MARIE T. CHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10240)
- CASAS + ARCHITECTS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9806)
- CTA Case No. 2664 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2664)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.