[ G.R. No. 16959. July 24, 1962 ]
[ G.R. No. 16959. July 24, 1962 ]
[ G.R. No. 16959. July 24, 1962 ]
INTESTATE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED CLODUALDO VITUG: DONATA MONTEMAYOR, ADMINISTRATRIX-APPELLANT VS. HEIRS OF EDUARDO D. GUTIERREZ, HEIRS-APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
LABRADOR, J.:
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
SUMMARY
Heirs-appellees moved to reconsider the decision in this case exempting the Administratrix to pay their deceased predecessor (father) for the legal services he rendered the Administratrix-Appellant, while reserving the right to demand attorney's fees from the heirs of deceased Clodualdo Vitug. Atty. Gutierrez was hired by the Administratrix and therefore, indirectly responsible to the heirs-appellees for the payment of the said attorney's fees.
RULING
It appearing that the Administratrix-appellant personally hired the services of deceased counsel, she is indirectly responsible for the payment of the fees adjudged by the court a quo in favor of heirs-appellees and charge the same from the heirs of the late Clodualdo Vitug.
More in SC Decisions
- P.E.T. Case No. 005, October 15, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 214440. June 15, 2016 ](787 Phil. 466)
- G.R. Nos. 130411-14, October 13, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 20426. May 24, 1967 ](G.R. No. 20426)
- [ G.R. No. 10557. January 29, 1916 ](G.R. No. 10557)
- [ G.R. Nos. L-44493-94. December 03, 1980 ](189 Phil. 396; 78 OG No. 45, 6139 (November 8, 1982))
- [ G.R. No. 106483. May 22, 1995 ](314 Phil. 46)
- [ G.R. No. 3606. March 18, 1908 ](G.R. No. 3606)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.