CTA Case No. 1787 (Decision)
~VICENTE DIEGO LOCSIN CTA CASE NO . 1787 and GUSTIN T. LOCSIN , Petitioners , - versus CIRILO B. GALLOS , in his capacity as Baco~od City Assessor , and Bacolod City Board of ssessment (Tax) Appeals , Respondents . X- - - - - - - - - - - - X DECI S I 0 N Petitioner Vicente Diego Locsin purchased on September 6, 1963 , Lot Noo 15, Bloci No . 3 , with an area of 600 square meters at PlOoOO per square meter, or for P6 , ooo . oo from the Capitol Subdivision, Inc . of Bacolod Cityo This lot is a portion of Cadastral Lot 1205 pt . which was assessed at P5 oOO per square meter on September 30 , 1963 under Tax Declaration Noo 14336 , effective 1964o On October 24 , 1963 , Lot 15 aforesaid was assessed at Pl2 o00 per square meter or a total of P7,200 by Tax Dec- laration No o 14528 , effective 1964, cancelling Tax Dec . laration No . 14336 as far as said lot is con'cerned o The assessment at Pl2 o00 per square mete r of said lot is P2 . 00 more than its purchase price per square meter . On March 5, 1964 , petitioner requested for the reconsideration of the said assessment but same was denied by respondent City Assessor Cirilo Bo Gallas in a letter dated March 13 , 1964 ( Exhs . 8 , 9 , 526
., > I� 11 1 I, t ' � ;. � ��� n~ t1 ��' �1ola �� c 01 t 0 11 � ... t ia ... ae1v .. 0 � ti � � h0 t 0 t I'J o. . 00 � era �~ o e f.4. 16 1' . t � �� 10 . 1 1� 1 t .... 3 � 3 �1 7 o.o 527
'/ ), 17 ? '' .f .. t7 73, � 19 5'1 Jlft 1 ion - 19 , , and. cont � ptuo tt} _to Lo 1 / ,, o� - hu '' ~.' / ... '1-, 528
( I t. ,' . . . . ,1. - ) ;:.' / per equat .. et~r ot Lot .N~. 16 ova 4 ab1o7fo0t7h�3()�uVp8rl'(t)o4t~r eta4t, Agu tin 1:_,. c i:Ot by Ta~ , clnratlon ,. the purpo$e oi' ehievtn& ti!"('},rlti. y aM rf!et tyi t. or r:tm 41 g .,. or -_fl:1' 1l'l3_uet1ce, as p~o 14 to jJ') '( SeotJ.on ~(4.} of 0~., Aot N~. 326, 8 �tah4eed~lertheortwi.....aaee knOV!'t as the CWu>~t� ol lod. In t'fl� A!. ht ot th1a o rcwut.a arut conaid rin that the re! pnn4ent 1. o ly eomplytrut. w1 b. biii dut:ie as p.resc 1 4 bf t � e. City Cht'rt-e:r:, tb eha r � or coot pt and . as nt '-�1n t b C1 ty A ae aor 11 ber�ll.v eon �1 _ re4 V1 t~ � . l'lt ss% In t 1a app-� l t>1t1 ners �re tha 1,.o mo.� 1' nd t6 1' ;QJr'f' .. onsly ~n ::?l!lessed; that Lot ' �� t 1. 00 per $QUa~ m. ~r as led Cedast.t J t t !~' o. 16 ehould a 6.00 per . quu , et~t 1o �t~� coxl3~ ~~ w:\th �r D c. No. t378i+J that the re.as&e� ant!' in qutt � ton te in violation ot l\ ol1ltlon ito. 83, se.r! a of 1963, of the ool City CoUilCil, layin own tte cl.t. � tb t ee1un::'f nto ot r 1 pr rper-t1tuw ahovl ,-o-~ or their 1962 a e�� ed values;
.' �, - � 111 �-. . if � � � r 0 1 � P n~ -~ t &l ' . 1 .r Q ta.. � to , ac ) Cl e t1 .. of v y ll t De ( if � � .,} t" 530
..' > .,. .., (" ~ � - .....; .<' :\-. .fl<� ' 1 0 ... �� r '', -~ () lo ty, 0� -f ' \ 'I' - ,�-' f r d '' h li c "'r �.. ). ' - 1 . ' ' n �,1 � 15 n atl at 531 �I
' ..~ ; 77 :1, ........... � !:1"�,:'-'~".' � / �- ' ��l4: "" .~_.I ,. 0 t ,"-. -, "...... �~ ~� "' "'~-~ 4. ~~4 {1 J <,'', �.1 .. ~\� '".,� 1 � '"' ~ 0 � 0 16 ;t �' r � : J! l1 )- � t\ '' 532
(11 y ~.. t!' .." ( .\ ,, � IJ ~ ' 1t ..-_ .:"( t .( a!lu .UJ tna � ttcn . 1 ntl '� ) � tr ,.�.I .o -�-~.;-~ \ ""' Jl ro t7 ot ta � 1.1,,,,., ,, 1 c���s.. 2771. 1 lo t �1 t t�r� � � ... t.a l � t I 16 � e e nd �� wit rut 311t.1t1. ( ~ o. 3 or t9 l� 1 I ol~ 0 '' � � t t �r t 533
' . ~ ~ :tf ... ' <' \ t' r �� 1 t-.oo. � ttt ,t � ... i 0 1� 1 �, ' ' ' 534 6,' '
.\ ' �' ..... ' .' . ,, ,, ''t '. ' ; '- \ ~ ~ .".'.~,...~. .. - - ~ 1 , , . ' ,; t .oo ' " �� 1 � 16 1-- re r 11 � .. ., 535
More in CTA Decisions
- COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1178)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NEWSPAPER PARAPHERNALIA, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1425)
- CTA Case No. 5335 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5335)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7426)
- PERPETUAL SUCCOUR HOSPITAL OF CEBU, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8912)
- PIONEER ADHESIVES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10567)
- CTA Case No. 1751 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1751)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1029)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.