CTA Case No. 149 (Decision)
... PIEPUBLT C OF TRF PHILIPPINEI ;�:<Jv H.T v X: AP.PEALS MA ~l LA � - ... v r -- -... - -. . . - . - ) .s ! t 10 l � l hi$ y. i r th to 1l �l r - _.; 815
... � - t 1 � � .,.. � ( 8 16
� �- - ..���..�.. � .�.�.�.�.�.�..��. ������ ...�.�.�.�.�.�.. . ..... ������� �������� .. .. �������� ��� � � . � ������ ... ,. y ��� �� �� � ���� �� ����� L �������� � ��������� � ) ic (� 8 17
� 14 ,. � � f l � �� l 11 I ,. 1 .t. ch a � t te nett t J t () ... l r tt t r pc h v T'prie in tm fo f1 tf � �n � 1 activities- ot In t r 1 - t to . )( n r c to 0 c t :r i.. 1 l ients xcl t t 0 - �' 818
1 I I l I ' I 1 � � ap 11. � " ? 819
�1 � c \ ide.r 1 J't 1t ,. th . t ett r 0 m .d � 191 � � r. ~ e ' ul) y 1 .. � 6, ;.)'/ ttat on say lq. .. l l I \t. 4!1:'0 l . � � ..,.. p ... ' (;.} 0 .' �� � f 1 'nly r e �s .. fo_ :t: cor.;:;;.i( t ~ �ay � V- .t G rch � ,J.:,~w5 1 an - � "t e � 9 , ;.~J. c., . 11 r. �C~i PP 0 y rec ) 1 . .0 ~- t ) -� vl1 Jun l' J 1 nt p '-1 on .... y .put� t n of ,,\") . ('" ) ! p icd cr ~ee t :on 11 of t " � 11 2~ . dy f~ on f th -.;oll ctor 0 n- , ...u u"'p~ .ct of t 1 ve � y to J I. t t!l~ od o. thu y day n} r fol h cei of to- �' !:) "" -n ... !' r ,. Xa v~n t l ni i6 l _ __..___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __...
� -- 1 t -- � v. wO � � � :l � t in wO ' .I. $ � .l�. .. f a g t VII tb io 0 t i.S l"id ... 1' l ca $ ul � f� c;; ... b ....1.."..'p. ih .... ,. a .:'\ :tt � ' �.r. � 91, ""' pt , r ,, I � �c t!e- % I ell c c . t b 1n . i I 'Y l:EfCOrd of ea e ,. th t """' y I PP s ujiir � c I i � 1 5� I n I I 0 "1: as a I I .. .. ~ .. !> tc If. 5 .... , I I � r I I I ' � f.:.. y crppe an� of' ;i e et er 0 appe ee afeny1�.�ng h1.s request , 821 'II
"l -. - � 1 5. i l'' 8 2 2 ,,. i'
�1 'j � con in . in- --...r tel i ir~ �p rt, l 1, 1 0 i1 � ttbu th 0 � I. H prov!s 01 $ ti ti ��n 1 rt �� u l i l. - 4 1n a nr. dr fi . 14 t .. of 11 rr. �h f� ~, n c t 1 � � ha j y p tlen:. nten ~ ti r v ... ht an l!n91 t '1 ic-..nscd .lh r"n .ci t "'J � 1 w�tl' t c'. r 0 t in 0 H Il l to ta ay 9 n n 0 nt � ro buttr s i ... in u in-G 'lfi'-t ._,:,n , ct--"'r nt h ...... t 1 n I c .:h z: I t i t iU is i cu a 11 t � l veo rt lJ l !.~cd l ~ ::� ~23 J
-. .n 1, � 1$ ... n- �tal, scl o pr ~ t nd fin - u. - � c aid h app ll nt h r �n .. �v u f h l. tion 178� n1 v .. axch� .. "' 9� � 1 � � -:: � 2./"y' rds� r$ Y� !.n c . 1' . � ! led ect r 1 v nu � t th"t . 0 ry, r'e nal D tc 0)d - .1 ym n .. ec fo � 11 tt 1 0 $r -~ .. "11 n in ' 824
1 ... a , e - 11 � - t � � 1 -- n 1 � lt � ., _, ;. 825
1 � 12 .. y! t t l:' o"!na 37~.~ to 1 � ,\.I 1y. ucl vo 0 n p- h ~1 pp l nt t 1.! nt in an � t nt .. p ion 0<' � 0 ... e tl.t ~ .d 10 of uyin appel . �� 1 nly i D' f c1 n . � el J. of 7 'hil. '. c ~,.. h n � rt - ( t v ho l. h ,e 826
� 827
t� � 1 9 .. l oo;; e p .l � 0 no ..h t c nn � J' , 0 p �- vnt ict .t. rtt. hi c y it ~ co .n 1 n n2 . a � 4. . ""' 1 r � J..t. i) I $0 Ct t,ld4!j. - c; n th.i at c ..:.o al o"" .. c n...�P.:ll.t tt &)' e r.t. partic.Jl rl ' c Q t f1:rErt point find pr ti �.o �"- Q� h . c 0 ..:.r: m tld ,r du 1 i .. 'toO . at on p "� 0 ' u� it h:' l:') thi$ c w s 0 :lppallnftt ull: th t rt., denc t tax 1d 0 rt s frt th a 1� � lhe p �l ot p i 82 8
l ... -I .. ""' ipt, ~rhi 1 {p. 6 ) ., g �y:ntn t . 'nde1.. , ft !' ving u.t t $ t to l t. :..th ' "' t s thu ��pp,e t c Chui a f Y� to � 1Q ao l fVt<J:t f n� �h r. f l"ld <--� ,,.f tt r ~.~ ~Ci-~"{ n h '.; ~c 1 A:t1 4 s -.e.1t i .ol..c.. 1& d i ~o,f i .. C . u....t . , 1� vu I tax s siul ,1) J t\. dt~ 1 i t1 � ' ,pf;' s t �;.... ~.._,y,:;r l P,;f:� n ;\ f c - se �nt 0 1 -t(!l" f .-.;;I . lrea y ""'i n it e f o r: n v_r C:'l�~� y~Jr ' !ir:..t~ �; iltV {" \~ 1 l~i '4 ; a� .. n- t Li i ... i app :ren ;.;.'y th� of i� ��� t li . �n t'f;it~tmito 'I c ' t ,...., ... lUd 10 { r f nd o 829
- d f ... om l. h e t:h t � t' unc nt IJh w� ir i. at u� p ym n c :rlc t� ctor ut sp � n � � 830
More in CTA Decisions
- UNIMASTER CONGLOMERATION INCORPORATED v. TACLOBAN CITY GOVERNMENT, PRIVATIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OFFICE, PHILIPPINE TOURISM AUTHORITY and PROVINCE OF LEYTE(CTA Case No. EB 901)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-90 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-90)
- NIPPON EXPRESS PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11111)
- CTA Case No. 604 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 604)
- NORTHWIND POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9202)
- SUMISETSU PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1352)
- CTA Case No. 5651 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5651)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FIRST PHILIPPINE UTILITIES CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2025)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.