[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37512
[ G. R. No. 37512. May 05, 1934 ]
JULIAN ARROYO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. FELIPE DIMABOGTI ET AL., DEFENDANTS, FELIPE DIMABOGTI, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT, VICTORINO ARROYO, ET AL., INTERVENORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from _________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00___, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. Nos. 127173-74, September 30, 1999
- G.R. No. 250330, March 18, 2021
- G.R. No. 105963, August 22, 1996
- [ G. R. No. 18034. September 02, 1922 ]
- [ G.R. No. 100643. October 30, 1992 ](289 Phil. 766; 89 OG No. 36, 5036 (September 6, 1993))
- G.R. NO. 154002, August 19, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 227147. July 30, 2018 ](837 Phil. 419)
- [ G.R. No. L-49439. June 29, 1983 ](208 Phil. 227; 80 OG 1968 (March 26, 1984))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.