[ G. R. No. 36745. August 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 36745. August 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 36745
[ G. R. No. 36745. August 02, 1934 ]
DEMETRIA T. VDA. DE QUINTOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. JORGE MARIANO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________May_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee _________ from the __________the appellant _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 171101, December 09, 2020
- [ A.C. No. 5573. November 21, 2017 ](821 Phil. 1)
- [ A.M. NO. 06-2-125-RTC. April 13, 2007 ](549 Phil. 537; 104 OG No. 21, 3834 (May 26, 2008))
- [ G.R. No. 148586. May 25, 2004 ](473 Phil. 136)
- G.R. No. 207958, August 04, 2021
- Adm. Matter No. P-02-1597 (Formerly AM-OCA-IPI-01-1050-P), February 17, 2003
- G.R. No. 203372, June 16, 2015
- G.R. No. 130941, August 03, 2000
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.