[ G. R. No. 40697. August 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40697. August 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40697
[ G. R. No. 40697. August 10, 1934 ]
KO BOGNAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. CHINA INSURANCE & SURETY CO. INC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Iloilo_________, dated the _________21st__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the defendant China Insurance & Surety Co., Inc. is absolved from the complaint, which is dismissed, with costs against the appellees.
It is further ordered that __________the appellant__________ recover from __________the appellees__________ the sum of P__80.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 234533. June 27, 2018 ](834 Phil. 679)
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-92-6-251. February 13, 1995 ](311 Phil. 238; 91 OG No. 5, 700 (January 30, 1995))
- [ G. R. No. L-5164. January 27, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 268891. October 22, 2024 ](959 Phil. 693)
- [ G.R. No. 139753. May 07, 2002 ](431 Phil. 485; 100 OG No. 11, 1552 (March 15, 2004))
- [ A.M. No. P-08-2432 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 04-2018-P). March 14, 2008 ](572 Phil. 24)
- [ G.R. No. 190016. October 02, 2013 ](718 Phil. 620)
- [ G.R. No. 268672. December 04, 2023 ](949 Phil. 830)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.