[ G. R. No. 39482. May 21, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39482. May 21, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39482
[ G. R. No. 39482. May 21, 1934 ]
GENERA PINEDA APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS , OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tarlac________, dated the __________30th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, without special pronouncement as to costs in the instance.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx_____ recover from xx__________xx__________xx____ the sum of Pxx__________xx as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. L-3506. January 31, 1951 ]
- G.R. No. 205413, December 02, 2013
- [ G.R. No. L-8371. June 30, 1955 ]
- G.R. No. 223102, February 14, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 116668. July 28, 1997 ](342 Phil. 302)
- [ G. R. No. L-4991. March 23, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 131750. November 16, 1998 ](359 Phil. 197)
- A.M. No. P-04-1875 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 03-1699-P), February 06, 2008
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.