[ G. R. No. 40923. August 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40923. August 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40923
[ G. R. No. 40923. August 10, 1934 ]
DOLORES TIGAS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. ESMERALDA VERSAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Bulacan_________, dated the _________12th__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 262579, February 28, 2024
- [ G.R. No. 227388. July 23, 2018 ](836 Phil. 997)
- [ G. R. No. L-15922. November 29, 1961 ]
- [ G.R. No. 121658. March 27, 1998 ](351 Phil. 526)
- G.R. No. 172820, June 23, 2010
- [ G.R. No. 106099. July 08, 1997 ](341 Phil. 184)
- G.R. No. 155838, January 13, 2004
- [ G.R. No. L-6116. December 29, 1954 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.