[ G. R. No. 40646. August 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40646. August 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40646
[ G. R. No. 40646. August 07, 1934 ]
FRANCISCO V. ARZADON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. CONSUELO DE LA PEÑA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the _________27th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiffs-appellee__________ recover from _________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-33158. October 17, 1985 ](223 Phil. 540)
- G.R. Nos. 237888 & 237904, July 28, 2020
- [ G.R. No. L-37146. March 05, 1984 ](213 Phil. 13; 84 OG No. 9, 1043 (February 29, 1988))
- [ G. R. No. 25459. August 10, 1926 ]
- G.R. No. 229262, July 07, 2021
- G.R. No. 189852, August 17, 2016
- [ G.R. No. 74145. June 17, 1987 ](234 Phil. 644)
- [ G.R. No. 5075. December 01, 1909 ](G.R. No. 5075)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.