CTA Case No. 1752 (Decision)
\ ,u~t> Ul'lUC OJ' THE PHILIPPINQ, CO�UR'.I' OF TAX APPE..A.La QUEZON C.rFY '� .. 11 � 1 .... .ie Cf t 01 r1� 19 d 19 0 c l V 0 0t .1 o io t � dul,y 0 .an d s 10 ; 1 1'0$ p re ~.! f . 1 017, 116.l.; n r �! .. y t tra varian 297
b p � tlttonel~ 1.' eviCl � n~d bJ hOJ'der � au or .f' ccou.nt .� Por tb s 14 1re IN!It ~~tit1on p~one ed an ar:tix~d dQcu. n- . on th or1 inal polloi is~. 1.1 by on 1t& i.t � �t .1tl.ne but d1d ot do no <~ ln Q, flf 11~na.t: ~at' h t~f' dated Janu � 1 o, 19 1 it ct Ac t .� g ~:.e istt l lJ1l'~OtOcr t~ a l'ropo . del'io1~ncv a~zest~r~Qnt for doewent$r3f .� c cpf' � e ~ la1qr� 1o the mount t;t Hlt 196-'� ~titioner ratect�d th .fl.t'oposed dErf'i ... ei. nc:7 alJ es 1t1:ent dbcl lmiJU .l:ta. 111t . on tbe g;l"Mri . at it t' thou. :t flal .nc!. fac -usl b&a1!h In l~~tt t � ~ t.,d f$l)t:tQfim~e 14-, 1'962 ,,...... sponde-nt d ~:nd a from. .,. �titictt�r th. � e � ot ~~6 . tB1.78 t � failur . tQ attaa tt~G oo reet o...... nt ,rr� ~taJlp. t$,. on it ret suane! eon ~rae 1 1l'l no. � ti ot $ection ~l21 ot �t f~ ~nt �CoCf , nd a. Cattfll' ��~. isft pttnalty to latfl ~nt .-tn tM ,m. t �t of' ~300.. '0 or tota "'t P6,4�.,1 /'/ "' ootnv ..t d
o. 1752 . tfioc '( ~rt ~:r 1959 � "' ~� ~ : i r ~ -:1 .. t ' ,. .. r�} ,..,.-. dr." ff'W~ -:1 f"'i t 1 lt, I 1~ ~c :um t . .x . c ... .�i~ _,_ ' \,. r 1 t1. i .' "' .ax f'r .� p.... !:A& -a I. 1:. vl bnt; ;.: ! th. .... 299
. o.. ,,. ,_ nor tht _tr � t 1 lOlls ). 1 w. oe1 t t o~p tin 1 .tter -t ta , ta � llo l~ rt:in l'�t 30
.. u ~ rol 301
: lC1SIO.~ -... 1?52 i e � (:: .�,{ ' � ..~ . 6 ~L'.h urr). of l nt .!'11 !. rv(-'; U$ he ' r ~rnr ru1 ed s ollo'W t S ff' �O ~ te1 th6 ~CHJ.. ~cu 'n 621 t.1e jttr! ... .f. ru...
.... 7 - t 0 �1 ... l t l r� t ent 1. o ! ,..,.-0 � .~~ ;.; .... Xc t~ t it r I II \ 0 e * i ly , uc ~ 1 � s w n tt .,.t' :!l!d. t .r li ( ~ � Ul' r. or"gi 303
175 1 ~ur 11 1 } . 1. i ish d tro or 10&3 of pro .rty n �or . i n . l"O'P "t 1n ur eo r c � � 9 nd 91 h su . n c /" ( .<!' ct1 n . pr ' id � � Th :r i.n n o.t c of r t l 'y, 0 21 Y OC:es ~ .ly t I' in e i ;U y t or1 i 1 ol1e1 s in� ~r nc , � rop .rty. t c1 i rv s � c t �
� u ' C� t
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 135 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 135)
- CTA Case No. 4858 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4858)
- CTA Case No. 4129 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4129)
- VESTAS SERVICES PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8877)
- BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7788)
- CTA Case No. 1043 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1043)
- EHS LENS PHILIPPINES, INC. (formerly HOYA LENS MANUFACTURING PHILIPPINES, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9014)
- VISAYAS GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7889)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.