CJPJ GENERAL MERCHANDISE, Represented by its Proprietress, MARIA VICTORIA CRISPIN, v. THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, Represented by COMMISSIONER ALBERTO D. LINA,
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THIRD DIVISION CJPJ GENERAL MERCHANDISE, CTA CASE NO. 8975 Represented by its Proprietress, Members: MARIA VICTORIA CRISPIN, Petitioner, -versus- BAUTISTA, Chairperson; FABON-VICTORINO, and, RINGPIS-LIBAN, JJ. THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, Promulgated: Represented by COMMISSIONER ALBERT D. LINA, Respondent. x-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x RESOLUTION On October 6, 2015, Atty. Jay G. Masangcay for petitioner, and Assoc. Sols. Princess Jazmine C. Logrofio and Kamille Deanne M. Lagasca for respondent, appeared. Upon motion of counsel for petitioner on the ground that petitioner's proprietress, Maria Victoria Crispin, who was present in Court, had decided not to pursue this case, and there being no objection interposed by counsel for respondent, the motion to withdraw was GRANTED. As prayed for, the Petition for Review was deemed WITHDRAWN. Accordingly, this case is now CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. (Took No Part) LOVELL R. BAUTISTA ~'- L- Associate Justice ~. ~ MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. 3M PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2872)
- PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT AND GAMING CORPORATION (PAGCOR) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8910)
- HEDCOR, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8037)
- NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION v. THE TARIFF COMMISSION, MAYER STEEL CORPORATION, MKK STEEL CORPORATION, SUPREME STEEL PIPE CORPORATION, MAGNITOGORSK IRON AND STEEL WORKS and OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY SEVERSTA(CTA Case No. 6180)
- D.M. WENCESLAO & ASSOCIATES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9764)
- CTA Case No. 3412 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3412)
- PRUDENTIAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6756)
- CTA Case No. O-75 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. O-75)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.