[ G. R. No. 41766. May 21, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41766. May 21, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41766
[ G. R. No. 41766. May 21, 1934 ]
JUAN R. TAÑADA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF GUMACA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, MOISES C. CAPARROS, ET AL., INTERVENOR-APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________19th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of both instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that _________the appellee_________ recover from __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 198240. July 03, 2013 ](713 Phil. 462)
- [ G.R. No. 178272. March 14, 2011 ](660 Phil. 545)
- G.R. No. 198804, January 22, 2014
- G.R. NOS. 145357-59, August 23, 2006
- [ Adm. Case No. 503. October 29, 1965 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-8715. June 30, 1956 ]
- G.R. No. 185460, July 25, 2012
- [ G.R. No. L-42620. April 30, 1985 ](220 Phil. 609; 84 OG No. 51, 7823 (December 19, 1988))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.