CTA Case No. 1330 (Decision)
j {j � ILl P J I 8 .fE ~ - ��� c ~ - 133 t' 1 19
( .. 2 - n�t t1 � 1ch 1 A 'b I ~ �' 1 n� ( � s. 7) ,, t ' � 0 � �1 1 ' C1 l - tn e 8 0 1 0 t s , le . c t -t - t 1 t � ' � tt J� wJ a ). l, c 1 1. a 4 1 �( � c � . � 1 "� '9 9� l' 9- 2 .) t tte 1 c � w r a ~ 6, 0 t er ( 1- ) t 1: � t r ' � ... � 9-l J:' ' .t ) I' 120
0 1 ..... -� l c s o. l l �0 2' 2, t is u d ains t1- � ��� 0 UA It tic � 7 Ol' 31J . 5S ( . b1 l:>' t � l 4 , . )J 2- ... t22l2- 2- ,.. � to 85 . , ( , ni . . �� � It, I - -59 tor 2lt � 5 ( 1 Te a � ii t r 1 1l 2, ' "l(ff pp . . � 1 5-18 � r A t yb 4 �h r on .. ' I' 2 19 2 ( ~xn .. 1 t h.e pr rt1� r t 1 l.i ot �t- 1 1 l �� tl ~ 0 � ( hb ucu C"- 5.. ' eoln Coll 1 oe th co r; d .rc on- t, ed1 t. d x url e catio ' i~ r 1 in � o t � b n t1t ot 1 ... vi u 1, tore 1 t, 1l'1 t e or ar t t ln o � ot ln Colle 1 t � a� 11 t b. t � in qu t1 n a 12:t
-- / � �� � h t a I ' .. � - � t � , � � !' 1 22
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS-SECOND DIVISION and EDS MANUFACTURING, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2062)
- ROHM APOLLO SEMICONDUCTOR PHILIPPINES, INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 59)
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE [consol with 8958](CTA Case No. 8902)
- CTA Case No. 4950 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4950)
- CTA Case No. 3754 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3754)
- CTA Case No. 5751 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5751)
- LKY Property Holdings, Inc., (Represented by Ms. Megan Astrid A. Nunez) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2986)
- KELPHIL INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7427)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.