[ G. R. No. 41343. August 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41343. August 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41343
[ G. R. No. 41343. August 01, 1934 ]
SIMEON RAMOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.LUISA CENTENO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Ilocos Sur_________, dated the _________15th__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instance against the defendant.
It is further ordered that _________the plaintiff___________ recover from __________the defendant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 172602, April 16, 2009
- [ G.R. No. 4432. October 15, 1908 ](G.R. No. 4432)
- [ G.R. No. 1066. November 22, 1902 ](G.R. No. 1066)
- A.C. No. 12044, July 23, 2018
- G.R. No. 122806, June 19, 1997
- [ G.R. No. 2485. August 17, 1905 ](G.R. No. 2485)
- G.R. Nos. 133685-86, May 20, 2004
- [ G.R. No. L-5692. March 05, 1954 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.