[ G. R. No. 41727. May 22, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41727. May 22, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41727
[ G. R. No. 41727. May 22, 1934 ]
VICENTE VERGARA ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLEES, VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF BARILI, CEBU, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, MAXIMO AGUILAR, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22st________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cebu________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that _________the appellees_________ recover from __________the appellants_________ the sum of __40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 115595. November 14, 1994 ](308 Phil. 166)
- G.R. No. 224507, September 20, 2017
- G.R. No. 151121, July 21, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 188320. June 29, 2010 ](636 Phil. 521)
- [ G.R. No. 44388. September 22, 1938 ](G.R. No. 44388)
- [ G.R. No. 233174. January 23, 2019 ](846 Phil. 110)
- [ G. R. No. L-32636. March 17, 1930 ]
- [ G.R. No. 30471. February 02, 1929 ](G.R. No. 30471)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.