CTA Case No. 1629 (Decision)
~ I ~EPUlU.IC OP TBR p.HJUPPI:N~ OOURT OF TAX A-PPE-'.UJ,. QUEZON CITT �' D c - -' � ~1l1 -- ... .. .. ~- ....� � I � ' � t ' l� .:122
ttl tltl: �" t~ 8 tif pclt�l I 1 Wedt aml I - 195'? . 19,a, (lnii'I"'DftA s wr � . 1 bCUiht 1 .� affix to � � lt,o,- - .� � rt,ontJUy a �t nt . o �. '. 4 _ pol � 7 'bu.Jl:tu:t :r� r :tater l�� e � ��� -� :r- ,ft . th ' tl OWl nt WU ttl tnfcaod Q S Oh lo$t� � p I� tion , . 1 t u61 .. �r�� Sye1p, 1 . let' r ~- Jtlly 1~t l9S9 � . in stlg tio ot �d,d lo& 1 rns� o.nd a (Htrtai,u h3' � p t!. :ton r t 1 . t� a t � 1GWumt 111 , t. sn . � Glt � It ti\lri . � 't 1._, ~ alleg <U.y fAil t tb1n the 't~iD pre ..,.._.....wdOl'l J1 th t Wl"ttt. $ l ��� Retula,ion Ho . Y-1 . d-.n in. 1 t� b r 1, 19 2, t � o at;mlQUJ:xeu ��'�1:7 ' s �'~�amvr ��� foP t PaJ'li at r .f.ocr..a the 128
.,. . � �1 .�
-- to~ t � r 11 t l' aile I o. 1 i t :0 OOf.le / 130
.... NO. l - s- ( l - -~ �l �t t �( ) $ t1.S:& - � 1 t.l ' ( -) �� ll t1oft of ~I, -� ) � r, de � ' 'l' r� 0 po * .1Cb � t 131
� ..J � 16 -- G1 �l adt1 t 132
'.' .. - ;., - .) ' _,_ 0'azr.o ~andu for ! ts .,C!Md nt. H Nh l l ,n~1p9l6l9e1d � ) re o.; Utldal'GC.Odng -� 19 � 200 ; C'Z.~ whil� : ~poltdent d<>ellt not il-1l3'p t tb.G ~:rcb4aae t <10 n.t~\: sta iha �nd ...}u~ir '.Cfi.; ture t he a1.llest at� p .�ta:t on the !tVtur no o tnt � 1 no de pa1d :tn oont :mpla ion ot th � le.w. Petlt1an r, o tbe oth r bs.n~, counto-r.-� tl ttt tb. req tr~d coeumeuttl!'J' ant! .b 1? aff1nure to the ~usine s � tG~n~t � an � . poll f: 1 t�a:- � j, ti'! d of to tlu~ inwrance polloi. , if ~&uffi �1 n �� ()Gmpl! n w t law. :Jn ot .,. we~ , it t!o ntary J.t r.up. to th dJ' :tht t o� lnt � J. by h � i� ., 1n$U~ance pol11e . 1rt this ca e, do a ~I 133
f;lf�1 10� ""' C'tA CJ :) Nt.. 1629 -... . 1$ tb t p ltlOUl: b F:ffi;;r. d to t' 4oc " t:s . t~ , , \ofh! .l'l in t ~:t~; c a ( Tie ffbr:.-u of' t:ift~l. t~ntat"f " �~"pa to pa e s othe~r tho m1�nor1 ~ .o by lnw :i.s no$ t�tam ""mt 1�o fail� � afti � t ' t fell b p !:~ b pettt1o � 'fh r t � o l&gal ~u .. ion or r~~po :..den tc :r w:ir{.t \'!- ti S<nt :r- to y a1n t . do.. ntary et ~P a . '\t.il ieh it a tl� r.-e y aid. 'Jo us a in r � ondilt1t � stant.l � ~1a � ul� f.o e� ano1: ltl � trrot'!e dad a a1n t f: r f\Et1lu e eotnply rith 'l. r qui:;; ent o1: .l'f'i .in~t thEt doeu ent ~t to the �r; .:tr :blQ\ i,tsu:..'anee ulbd.eJ l.(tl!l nQt fot t 1lur tQ p tb.t> t x. (st s c� � 3 ]tt2� ~ � � co ��'J ( It filiO"Uld $ cbee'l" �ec. t11at tb. law l l � s ffixtt:tt . oi' t!OC1lr.ct ta, y p ,. o t~nch .the 1 m ;r be 1. ~. 1 t � y law e:r r g l tie I' $ th' ;p... op r- 134
� - v � � t 1 .) l p i I� .) r Ye � 1�
More in CTA Decisions
- OAKWOOD OVERSEAS LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8196)
- BETHLEHEM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10050)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2497)
- CTA Case No. 4878 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4878)
- CTA Case No. 6293 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6293)
- CITY TREASURER OF MANILA v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-20)
- MUNICIPALITY OF ITOGON, BENGUET, and ANGELA C. CARI?O, v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION (NPC), & POWER SECTOR ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (PSALM)(CTA Case No. AC-238)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILPLANS FIRST, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2351)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.