CTA Case No. 1964 (Decision)
' I Lll,'P \liB I\. APl-lE, L8 � � 1 :"4 I - 1 � t r ' 2 " � 276
'10.F1J!4 2 r ;,~ est. te, thrnu .,11 f!":i'"~ t�al reque~ted reconsi erut. on of' the assessment -rn. a l ....ter \ 1er nt y cletu.i � ot tho ,~ ate p L ~he t al umo~nt of �2?2, 760. 86, not 1ri!Olut.i111� M1e 1.! an.. f~r t, Y~ $ due 01: tha NZIOUrJ.t Q f 11212, ( 3. t3, ~ '� ."'!h T' pr s nt~ t v .lu or the d ......Jent * on .. � vh � 'l\3SS~"''�$llt De pa rtment to.t~ and 1 1.- tt.::.t t ..nt.. ~1 l<! in ..: n i �� 'l',j flt;' unt ot �;;? )81 '" ~i() ( n.... ' ~':'!{~ *�8, 35 Q!i � e n - � de""~"" .A....;..t...,; ,... pore :U1 nd nhor t<: ne. ~�-I'J ' or on - hc.lf t) .' t'l ,...clone r ont� :1 � nteres, U:') to '"'Y I. 277
- 3 1 7 eo p t d r ���� �1 _!- 1.t .. 0 ., �.. . . . ��.. �.. " � io � � �.. � � � � in l �t � tt na n . ' l- t~ � �ou b n 6. t� i � .�. .... ��� o� l�l �t- �� ' 12, 1"" s, , 3, 19 l to �o ~ y . ' n .. I ti l t y .. ~.'135 . 37 til t0 e 0 . 17 .. d 110 o, 196 . ' . y lt 196? to ni ;r �tor � .' r 11' 19 278
D... ~ \.10' - <.Ll !h. � lKI . 196' l I' .r t .. :; t.l t .' ..l .. e rer L r the cr..)<il � a � ~ �t or :.r n:r t ts tut or n . ion J .... t � tio r , U1� r~ held .r j l 1 .- ::i ion of til� t.. � ~ou.rt in .t e ~ .. se c the � f ..er ti ;0 1 �t tl14 c e on .. . � _, ~;2~0 tie b J!( ei it� lir ' �n.1 .h . r~ s u~ ,..f � .1' hA t t ..btl J th~ .l -"� r; '"'(~ - I" t1 t:he vOU.�:t;: it for he ril)J tr) ro . ;.1. \tO .! .., l ��w 0 .. e ,� 1_ .~o.. &. <:> G r or t .ir.o. ~..oo ..rt J. ~""it ion. . 1 .1 ctlon �o t b:' co nj. ~nee t.11. t iG ~~~ . ... L �, l I p ti.t ert to tbls i�~, .:U .s .epubl t c I ! 125, uor ' ' rly , ct 0 7 n 1 1 th r 0 279
D~C I ..iiOll ... cr:~ ;Hv .... EO . 1964 5 penaltles imposed in relation thereto, or other mt>'tters ~rL.. ing unuer the �-ation.-'11 n- In~ernal .. evenue vode or ot.ler law or n rt of law aJrtdnistered by the Lureau of ternal .~~.evenue; X XX XXX XXX XXX "'ac . 11 . v. o may a.T.h>e::\1 ; effect of a;p )enl . - .cy person, associa,:;ton or cor- p.;t�ation adversely affected by a decision or ruline of the ~ommission.. r of Intern.."J.l ~ ~venut;:, the ~ollec�tor of ::;ustofls or an� proViJ.~Cial 0!' Ci't;y Poard Of t~SS..JS!:;Y'C:lt i p- pealS may file an np,;eal in the Court of ~rl'.x H).>e~lls v�li th5.n t ..lirty d.-:tys after the rt~ce1pt of such .,1 clsion or ruling . l.o Ulveal taken t.:O uhe vOUrt: Of ~aX I~ Har::.ls from the decision of tl'J.e c~..>nu:��issJ�. n- t.Jl'~ of Internal devenue or the ~ollector o�r Ct stom!.> r;hc.ll suspend the oaymant , levy, strai J.t , anu/or sale of :.ny prop �rty ot ttle ta::...'< yer ror the satisfaction of l1ir.; ta.c liahllity c.d ,H'OI!id3d by existing la1.r.: .?rovided, hovrever, Th:.:�t when in the opinion O.L t;1e ~ourt the collection by the J�ureau o Internal !tevenue ol" the Co!ru"'li;:.sioner of ustmns may jeot,f'l'<iize thll iHterest of ":he GovP.rr>..n;,ent end/or the axpayer the ..:ourt at ar~1 r;tage of t:he J.i'roeeedi:n!"; mt:Y suspend the <:laid coller,:;tlon :u1d raquire the ta:x- puyer either to de 1wsi t the at.ou.nt clalned 01 to .f'.lle a surr~t~r bond for not n ore than doubJ.e the amourrt; \�tith the Court . BetLled is c.he rule ti:1at all final G.eeisions of the ~omrJis., oner of Internal Revenue under oection 11 of hepublic Let ~o. 1125 re appealable to tho Gourt of .L'ax 1 pet:tls aud that o e th t threaten~ col- lect:on t.h.rm: gh administrative remedies nrovided by lt;it�!, as 1n the p:r�esent C<J se , is considered a final and c.ppealable decision (vt:; . ;}tephen ' ::; Associatio � Collect.o:r of Internal devenue , 10�+ 1'hil . 314-; Rafael
6 hl n 1"' r eo� ery t. tna 0' . ('}f ~ X "" er t pp � la pt t�s.l n 0 ction 3o6 t .e 1: wh1.b .: (),1'1, ~unr thtW# 6 0 h :r lall�� � '�he lf:Jl �:ct1o 11 o ~ p.Jbl c !t t .... e .to 11 l ,;,.vli y ot 281
'' )l.J ! l�~ LOti ... Gl\a ..:dJ.u � 1964 7 :u~vet1t.h.: t th t 11:., at'ter t,he- v t;tt:�:r� lie.- rer..'let e:l n rtru 1 ...eels [Qn� ..:ti:t(n:io;:'l ,306 of th'C r..:~x ;"tlrL: ,. on the .;ttwr ttt3t:1d, t'~qUi ~S iJ yr: e.n~ Of th ta_::;. fi!'St 'be "'f'"'fl H taX:[.'O;.N;~l" ct..rs ott~$tton in S1Jit th;; lu, l.i.t.r of such payment . It is not ll.,i.!f'!!':": ,.. 't.T'Y tha te 1 �n!t..; tJ);' e r X i:... t' t: rot st; he ""~ t...n.; .. in to action 1 t 282
1' ~ e t t: c �J.on '* o u a.n b;; th- "" rttJ1 a n �l" 1t l s i ~ 1 to :r uL .,. th t . .... 0 �~.r~th :'>l.r- e1 � c t " ' (t ~.il� 1 to ts __ e1aior~ a;.s l-e--nt fl�,., t ....._ 7h tl 1 � lhns, arr~c tf: i ... ::')~ h it" .h ,....,.,,,.,. ... 1 f pli>bt1c Q ... to . 1 ~c ;;. tho r1 lt, !) qU.O.'J.tlon tb~ 1 Ltty of ~ t X l.t>VOltt$1.,. \l~ � ~tn �rno-;. 1 P*ty1:n~. th �x tl" l u , !0 (j ion 3 � 1 f!nr: .1. t t .s :so for 283
... '.;r.;rm~ :, .. rio. '\.� 11~ v.s. t96~i� / 9 cit.l� 284
rJc�~!.l ... ' 195'5 did ... r; � j �H.o ;i(). 1964 10 � t th 1 .. f e ;lno l'h.' 1 � u.e in th .. �n�t , ..h? lnv o.. on J ;�~, 19':;.5 t; Ol'l l hz �� .;,q .o ). .o n o"': 1 ;. '� ftv)t :tn 1s_vut-1) .~o .. e the '.r.��t ... �0 ("'y Hoc Llo v . u"' .u. t 1 ' 1 l � 1J � Wd..L. 98 ) . 'lh. OV1 1, 2 �. ov c:. aw t n t.t;H1~ �y 2, 19/5, no , b :r ��. 19o2; thE vile ~0 . at l'te ne s ou 1' ;es tt ... ::.. \o{ o..~.� t' Ol th~ 1 t t r ,a ( � X 5t. ll.l. not rt'! eor_.J .;c�,u. e thtt th law () en Jl.\ft ..dOt b r 1+, 1962 (ha }. i � tr.~ or.. e c ;to> ank v. !ot~Ol' l tenaneio .t.J e J.in .-:ot ~J. � , � �� , .~ .-::..7936 r:t.d f. - 27Y.37, AU �c ~~ , 19 4 � u ..e on1 oture ,f~ v o.11 b.nz rMo s ,et.:i.tioner 1\.�:l::~d 1,, t ;l"' �Jas ... to ro i.lee , .d tn � .� r o. t 285
286
HC, 1$ � 12 :n, ro 'Oit o: n eo t !.lnt oont . t 1' t_ in - .3250 .�l � c ... t on h � 1 "a .1 ct.... � f X X 287
D~I'l<J- ... c to. I .�� vA~i; 19~4 13 a �oth~r e .r 1 .ical;ion asue J t :.t::r I S.:.lO ld bn 00 e1 h..,.t. .n t. t ~ �t i fif!>l t ! � n ' � w!o-mt i� att 1 0 1.., t th of ~\'! . 1 ~ o� ' tJClllUu.ry-~ o 193 . was a'till ).... ,e J~n Janu::rY ~) . t;, ~ t !. n nnl~" to ,.,he value of l . c .rti c ion s t tt ~ l� v ot' 1 r on J ... - t. oor.. "~Y v� �� t � t t 1 e t�ti. 'ic tto , consideri " be pr !' 0 1T.tit l icy . trust ill' COt't- ~t 1ne W'$ l.. .cnt.. ,, ot1> ehrnrTe or a. nir en..:. 1 tn the t ic of tt '? 1 \<1 of' Ja ' 30, 1 2 r. .tt-:. .r f.s noth � 1 n the . cnm:.9nt t:h f"�' ~ ..p.,.:t - ~ t t a rt f _e .tion f;p ;re 4 J.. 1 r of c u t � se 1 on n...d ��e� tif c �1o1 is s tl . ctm:jl' 288
.... L ..... 1/ v 1 ),;~ 1 .; '1 �61� 14- p�?.) rt a in 1962 ,, t f. t- e n r c n '.nu� � th " i g th in 19 � vI :r ._ rt . ~ '� at ~ �t. �. these 1 n J9 2 0 1" in tho y r n <!C):'j,. f\ b .d t thrt'lt !}' ' t�' irJ.~ " ~~ , ( t.uoo;.er v. iX t 3ttpr�~) . I J i t () () ! a UG- a~ n ,, t . ~ eol1. ct ir. nt or .~� ., ;5r..; 54 t r st tro 4, 19v7 'rh.:.::-n "mS it:'! CU ... t Ohtcl: .:r. 10 , 1968 1. t C' nt �rr:� out y t � 0 ~a. J t . . .. 0 c �.ion hr y tr, t '1.a ~o r:.t rc.t.� tm > e �:tt r� <4 pot~ ant �nc� u~. of ,,555,. 9i "' t. 1 .. o :r ..
More in CTA Decisions
- AP HOLDINGS, INC. v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his official capacity as the City Treasurer of Davao City(CTA Case No. AC-129)
- CTA Case No. 5363 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5363)
- CTA Case No. 3606 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3606)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VESTAS SERVICES PHILIPPINES, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2255)
- DOLE Philippines Inc. Stanfilco Division, v. The Sangguniang Panglungsod of the City of Davao and the Hon. Sara Z. Duterte-Carpio and Hon. Lawrence D. Batinding, in their respective capacities as Mayor and Acting Treasurer of the City of Davao(CTA Case No. EB 3098)
- PILMICO-MAURI FOODS CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 97)
- ROXAS HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2672)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TITANIUM CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2502)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.